Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: Game 78 - Sens @ Blue Jackets, Fri, Apr 22, 7:00pm

Post Info
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Game 78 - Sens @ Blue Jackets, Fri, Apr 22, 7:00pm
Permalink  
 

Heading to Europe in the fall is a bold choice.



-- Edited by Cathy on Friday 22nd of April 2022 09:13:31 PM

Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:

did we have a net off moorings?


 no



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 

did we have a net off moorings?



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
SensKat wrote:

ok, so I guess I missed the 2nd too....


 Your dabs so far.  you got a few chances.


 Thanks!



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well, there's a couple official 2-on-1s



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 

as for the tkachuk offside, war room sucks. that's just stupid to call that. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:

ok, so I guess I missed the 2nd too....


 Your dabs so far.  you got a few chances.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Russell wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Um, Lube?


 I missed it.


 Lol, they literally used the word "lubricant" when talking about Noodles voice.


 gotta count then, right?


That's a slippery one. 


that is what she said.  



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
ok, so I guess I missed the 2nd too....

Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Um, Lube?


 I missed it.


 Lol, they literally used the word "lubricant" when talking about Noodles voice.


 gotta count then, right?


That's a slippery one. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Um, Lube?


 I missed it.


 Lol, they literally used the word "lubricant" when talking about Noodles voice.


 gotta count then, right?



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 

there's your silver lining. No more bruce this year. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 
tjlincoln wrote:
Russell wrote:

i'm at the cottage, watching game on laptop so can only check in during the intermission. 

BTW, I'm calling a refs suck on watson's penalty. he was just finishing his check. 


 Good for you ✅👍

What is considered a cottage in Canada? A vacation home? A vacation rental? Is it a 2nd home? 


 its a nice cottage, not a shack. my folks lived here for years. right on the Ottawa river, waterfront. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 

On the disallowed goal, I remember another instance where the door was inside the blue line and a goal was disallowed as offside because plyer left the ice inside via the door inside the blueline before tagging up.  I don't know if it's an actual rule, but do remember that. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

2nd period stats

11-10 Sens


 stats, plural, suggests more than one stat


Each team have shots so those are two statistics?  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

Also missing SOG on that. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

2nd period stats

11-10 Sens


 stats, plural, suggests more than one stat



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 

2nd period stats

11-10 Sens



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 

Noodles talking is like nails on a chalkboard.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 

So how long after Kat shows up does CBJ score?



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Homer wrote:

2-on-1 Sens and they score. 

Both a couple new guys. 


 Hold the phone, CBJ are challenging.


 Well, the 2-on-1 still counts regardless. evileye


 Hmm, good question.  Is it a 2-on-1 if it was offside?

We count it as a goal disallowed, which was after the 2-on-1, so I guess we'll allow it.

Lack of dab-able plays so far makes it easier to accept that one. 


 Yeah, I guess since we rewound time maybe not. My original thought was the 2-on-1 wasn't part of the actual goal but since that time never happened it's in a weird gray area.


 yeah, lack of dabs makes it more acceptable.  if game was a dab-fest it might be different. 



 
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.