Sens are playing, what I’d call, lazy hockey tonight.
SensKat wrote:ok, they can totally score 4 this period without being scored on, right?
ok, they can totally score 4 this period without being scored on, right?
and Russell with drink a 50 for each of those goals.
SensKat wrote:Spezzial-Delivery wrote:I'm also getting slaughtered, I can't predict anything except a loss 90% of the time. I suppose it was only fair of us to give the rest of them a fighting chance this year.
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:I'm also getting slaughtered, I can't predict anything except a loss 90% of the time.
I'm also getting slaughtered, I can't predict anything except a loss 90% of the time.
I suppose it was only fair of us to give the rest of them a fighting chance this year.
THIS 👆
Russell wrote:Homer, you got rid of that bad second period square too soon.
Homer, you got rid of that bad second period square too soon.
it was replaced with "Outshot in the 2nd", so a bad period is most likely to get outshot.
I’d throw it out there that boro's penalty was a dumb one.
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:@Katt - really, any bet for the Sens winning is already playing against the percentages lol
@Katt - really, any bet for the Sens winning is already playing against the percentages lol
yeah, but I've been betting against them all season, and I'm getting slaughtered in the pool!
👍😂🤣
Homer wrote:Well now... scored in final minute of a period. Don't remember if that's still a square or not.
Well now... scored in final minute of a period. Don't remember if that's still a square or not.
And they ad another to make it 5-2. Both in the final minute.
Scoring within 60 seconds square is for teams scoring on each other, not one team scoring two.
tjlincoln wrote:Barkov winner in a Panther 5-2 win
Barkov winner in a Panther 5-2 win
Quit scoring
