Russell wrote:unbelievable.
unbelievable.
One might say AYFKM on that save.
I'm gonna need a physics review on that one.
Russell wrote:i need something reviewed!
i need something reviewed!
I need...too much to list
that was kinda funny, schaeffer running interference on eller trying to get to bench. pretty ballsy for a rookie.
Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:devi-devi-deviation? not sure that counts, off the goalie.
Cathy wrote:devi-devi-deviation?
devi-devi-deviation?
not sure that counts, off the goalie.
We don't usually count off the goalie deviations.
'tis okay, I don't have the square. (was really hard to tell and I don't have rewind tonight)
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Those odds of making the playoffs aren't encouraging. KTF twjbjs
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Those odds of making the playoffs aren't encouraging. KTF
Homer wrote:Those odds of making the playoffs aren't encouraging.
Those odds of making the playoffs aren't encouraging.
KTF
twjbjs
Russell wrote:new guy point!
new guy point!
He's got 3 with OTT?
So, like, almost half of his goals in 2 weeks with Sens.
Damn it, not the same feed. You guys didn't hear that comment. argh.
Wait, I just realized we aren't watching the same feed...did they give actual percentage odds? What were they?
pissed away too many points earlier in the year. Took too long to get their goaltending figured out.
one timer
Homer wrote:Russell wrote:i thought that was in. twss
Russell wrote:i thought that was in.
i thought that was in.
twss
nah, she'd know for certain
