3 pts for cozens.
Cathy wrote:data_sprite12 wrote:One timer?Goalie pulled. Listed as wrister, but my bingo card can be convinced otherwise.
data_sprite12 wrote:One timer?Goalie pulled.
One timer?
Goalie pulled.
Listed as wrister, but my bingo card can be convinced otherwise.
Not quite a one timer. Apologies.
leaf fans booing.funny ****.
I have no dabs from that exchange, nothing.
Cathy wrote:Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:{Cathy does not understand the rules well enough to comment on this particular offside review} It was a dumb challenge. So one might even say…a dumb penalty? Also, here a post, there a post, everywhere a post post!
Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:{Cathy does not understand the rules well enough to comment on this particular offside review} It was a dumb challenge.
Cathy wrote:{Cathy does not understand the rules well enough to comment on this particular offside review}
{Cathy does not understand the rules well enough to comment on this particular offside review}
It was a dumb challenge.
So one might even say…a dumb penalty?
Also, here a post, there a post, everywhere a post post!
I'd allow that.
Extra dumb, now.
woo to the hoo
Screen goal
Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:the shot attempts - shots - goals ratio is not fair but I'll take it Eh, about that...
Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:the shot attempts - shots - goals ratio is not fair but I'll take it
Cathy wrote:the shot attempts - shots - goals ratio is not fair
the shot attempts - shots - goals ratio is not fair
but I'll take it
Eh, about that...
Twss
Play under review.
at the bunny hop
That was a nice goal!
Two in 90
Russell wrote:Back just in time.
Back just in time.
debatable
Cathy wrote:data_sprite12 wrote:Sens post Sens that was a 2nd post *and* then post and in, yeah? lol
data_sprite12 wrote:Sens post Sens
Sens post Sens
that was a 2nd post *and* then post and in, yeah? lol
Yes.. Google auto correct for the French+English is getting worse.
