AYFKM?!
Russell wrote:That’s in!
That’s in!
twss, and we get to see it in slow motion over and over.
Cathy wrote:OMG are we sure that didn't go in?!?!?
OMG are we sure that didn't go in?!?!?
Omg Twss!
EVERYONE watching the replay!
data_sprite12 wrote:Ex Sens point for Foligno on the second Hawks goal.
Ex Sens point for Foligno on the second Hawks goal.
You guys KNOW I'm terrible at that one.
Annnnd also don't have it.
Another square I don't have.
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:That was 2-in-90 Pfft, been there done that.
Homer wrote:That was 2-in-90
That was 2-in-90
Pfft, been there done that.
She just said that!
Cathy wrote:Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:AI Chatbot dman PP goal Your secretary of education calls it A1 . Oh, is that who did it? I knew someone did.
Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:AI Chatbot dman PP goal Your secretary of education calls it A1 .
Cathy wrote:AI Chatbot dman PP goal
AI Chatbot dman PP goal
Your secretary of education calls it A1 .
Oh, is that who did it? I knew someone did.
She’s the only one in the USA that doesn’t know what AI is. Good job for her.
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:2nd cousins goal on a breakaway I should clarify…that's a goal by a 2nd cousin, not a second goal by Cousins. Cozens knew what you were saying. lol Oh, so you mentioned maybe a Cousins/Cozens square…what if we *did* call it 2nd cousins (or cozins) and if they both get a point in the game? I like that idea. I'll try to remember to add it before last game of the season. I've been calling them 2nd cousins for fun, but I couldn't figure out what the dab criteria would be until just now. That would be a dab tonight.
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:2nd cousins goal on a breakaway I should clarify…that's a goal by a 2nd cousin, not a second goal by Cousins. Cozens knew what you were saying. lol Oh, so you mentioned maybe a Cousins/Cozens square…what if we *did* call it 2nd cousins (or cozins) and if they both get a point in the game? I like that idea. I'll try to remember to add it before last game of the season. I've been calling them 2nd cousins for fun, but I couldn't figure out what the dab criteria would be until just now.
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:2nd cousins goal on a breakaway I should clarify…that's a goal by a 2nd cousin, not a second goal by Cousins. Cozens knew what you were saying. lol Oh, so you mentioned maybe a Cousins/Cozens square…what if we *did* call it 2nd cousins (or cozins) and if they both get a point in the game? I like that idea. I'll try to remember to add it before last game of the season.
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:2nd cousins goal on a breakaway I should clarify…that's a goal by a 2nd cousin, not a second goal by Cousins. Cozens knew what you were saying. lol Oh, so you mentioned maybe a Cousins/Cozens square…what if we *did* call it 2nd cousins (or cozins) and if they both get a point in the game?
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:2nd cousins goal on a breakaway I should clarify…that's a goal by a 2nd cousin, not a second goal by Cousins. Cozens knew what you were saying. lol
Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:2nd cousins goal on a breakaway I should clarify…that's a goal by a 2nd cousin, not a second goal by Cousins.
Cathy wrote:2nd cousins goal on a breakaway
2nd cousins goal on a breakaway
I should clarify…that's a goal by a 2nd cousin, not a second goal by Cousins.
Cozens knew what you were saying. lol
Oh, so you mentioned maybe a Cousins/Cozens square…what if we *did* call it 2nd cousins (or cozins) and if they both get a point in the game?
I like that idea. I'll try to remember to add it before last game of the season.
I've been calling them 2nd cousins for fun, but I couldn't figure out what the dab criteria would be until just now.
That would be a dab tonight.
Quick, add it! lol
I was actually thinking for next year, but I suppose that's not a guaranteed possibility.
Omg, the shot count
That one was certainly not screened.
good grief
