AYKM save !
Oh, and def a London Bobby heading to commercial
data_sprite12 wrote:Cathy wrote:Sens score 1st, on PP + New guy point
Cathy wrote:Sens score 1st, on PP
Sens score 1st, on PP
+ New guy point
Damn it! Same new guy I forgot last time.
data_sprite12 wrote:Cathy wrote:data_sprite12 wrote:Cathy wrote:So do you guys have a new PM? The headlines are ambiguous on whether it's a new PM or just a nominee. Once he's sworn in a couple of days from now he'll be the actual PM. Everyone excepts he'll trigger an election soon after that.So new PM (selected, not elected) and assumed pending election could bring yet another PM? I think I understand why the headlines were ambiguous.When that's not the system you grow up with…that sounds SO crazy. lol Yes, that is correct. Historically we had sacrificial PMs who were in the office for 30 days before their party were swept in the next election. With Carney it's a bit more complex because many people don't like the Conservative party, even if they were tired of the Liberals.
Cathy wrote:data_sprite12 wrote:Cathy wrote:So do you guys have a new PM? The headlines are ambiguous on whether it's a new PM or just a nominee. Once he's sworn in a couple of days from now he'll be the actual PM. Everyone excepts he'll trigger an election soon after that.So new PM (selected, not elected) and assumed pending election could bring yet another PM? I think I understand why the headlines were ambiguous.When that's not the system you grow up with…that sounds SO crazy. lol
data_sprite12 wrote:Cathy wrote:So do you guys have a new PM? The headlines are ambiguous on whether it's a new PM or just a nominee. Once he's sworn in a couple of days from now he'll be the actual PM. Everyone excepts he'll trigger an election soon after that.
Cathy wrote:So do you guys have a new PM? The headlines are ambiguous on whether it's a new PM or just a nominee.
So do you guys have a new PM? The headlines are ambiguous on whether it's a new PM or just a nominee.
Once he's sworn in a couple of days from now he'll be the actual PM. Everyone excepts he'll trigger an election soon after that.
So new PM (selected, not elected) and assumed pending election could bring yet another PM? I think I understand why the headlines were ambiguous.
When that's not the system you grow up with…that sounds SO crazy. lol
Yes, that is correct. Historically we had sacrificial PMs who were in the office for 30 days before their party were swept in the next election.
With Carney it's a bit more complex because many people don't like the Conservative party, even if they were tired of the Liberals.
Merci
data_sprite12 wrote:Cathy wrote:data_sprite12 wrote:Cathy wrote:So do you guys have a new PM? The headlines are ambiguous on whether it's a new PM or just a nominee. Once he's sworn in a couple of days from now he'll be the actual PM. Everyone excepts he'll trigger an election soon after that.So new PM (selected, not elected) and assumed pending election could bring yet another PM? I think I understand why the headlines were ambiguous.When that's not the system you grow up with…that sounds SO crazy. lol Yes, that is correct. Historically we had sacrificial PMs who were in the office for 30 days before their party were swept in the next election. With Carney it's a bit more complex because many people don't like the Conservative party leader, even if they were tired of the Liberals.
With Carney it's a bit more complex because many people don't like the Conservative party leader, even if they were tired of the Liberals.
Several AYKM saves!
data_sprite12 wrote:Net unmoored
Net unmoored
my card sucks
Sens hit post.
TCathy wrote:Refs suck for being in the way and breaking Chabot?
Refs suck for being in the way and breaking Chabot?
We’ll make that call if he doesn’t come back.
Russell wrote:Lost lid
Lost lid
Lol, I might have to switch to the legit feed just to stay in sync.
Russell wrote:Last minuet no no.
Last minuet no no.
???
Methinks me behind
