last minuet naughty
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Play under review.I'm lost on the refs reasoning of no goal for GI, but we'll review it so see it it went in it's own?and goal disallowed dab. Wait, it's not a disallowed dab is it? It was always no goal. Disallowed as the play was still active. Kind of like a high stick deviation.Time expired I think is when we don't count it as disallowed. Maybe a few other instances?
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Play under review.I'm lost on the refs reasoning of no goal for GI, but we'll review it so see it it went in it's own?and goal disallowed dab. Wait, it's not a disallowed dab is it? It was always no goal.
Homer wrote:Play under review.I'm lost on the refs reasoning of no goal for GI, but we'll review it so see it it went in it's own?and goal disallowed dab.
Play under review.
I'm lost on the refs reasoning of no goal for GI, but we'll review it so see it it went in it's own?
and goal disallowed dab.
Wait, it's not a disallowed dab is it? It was always no goal.
Disallowed as the play was still active. Kind of like a high stick deviation.
Time expired I think is when we don't count it as disallowed. Maybe a few other instances?
Gotcha, I was reading the dab list as chronological. lol
Last minute naughty slash.
minuet penalty
yet another square I don't have
Not a fan of Prime greying out the team that's on the penalty kill. You'd think a tech company family with UI accessibility principles would remember colour blindness.
data_sprite12 wrote:Yes
Yes
An 8-minute stoppage really messes with one's sense of timing.
Oh, maybe not official funny **** but it was funny when the DJ wasn't paying attention and didn't stop the music for the ref.
Wait, was that overflapping??
Russell wrote:don't think i like this challenge
don't think i like this challenge
Dumb challenge to take. dumb penalty.
the stick in the face is going to get called, i think.
Lol, do we keep the disallowed dab if the second challenge is in our favor?
Ref: "Goal disallowed because of GI"
Sens: "You guys suck, check again."
data_sprite12 wrote:Cathy wrote:This one's strange…I don't see another hit to the puck but it seemed to move with some velocity. Is it our fault if they shove it into their own net?
Cathy wrote:This one's strange…I don't see another hit to the puck but it seemed to move with some velocity.
This one's strange…I don't see another hit to the puck but it seemed to move with some velocity.
Is it our fault if they shove it into their own net?
Nope, but it def wasn't "continuous motion" so *something* hit it.
