Was watching some of the news reports on U tube about the fire. Scary.
And people looked at me funny when I said one of the reasons I moved was climate change. The only thing really different about these fires is that they're penetrating further into the "woodland urban interface" that most fires. As for "fires in winter", that been normal for the last 5-6 years.
Is the actual city of L A in danger?
What do you consider the "actual city of LA"?
If you're thinking downtown skyline, LAX, Staples Center, etc… no. But the city is 500 sq miles and does border wildland in spots. A lot of the city "names" you hear, like Hollywood, are districts within LA city rather than independent cities themselves.
The big thing is they've always *said* embers can travel up to 5 miles, but they never really have carried into densely populated areas before now. Ember travel is usually only a serious issue for the actual "wildfires" on undeveloped land.
Was watching some of the news reports on U tube about the fire. Scary.
And people looked at me funny when I said one of the reasons I moved was climate change. The only thing really different about these fires is that they're penetrating further into the "woodland urban interface" that most fires. As for "fires in winter", that been normal for the last 5-6 years.
Was watching some of the news reports on U tube about the fire. Scary.
And people looked at me funny when I said one of the reasons I moved was climate change. The only thing really different about these fires is that they're penetrating further into the "woodland urban interface" that most fires. As for "fires in winter", that been normal for the last 5-6 years.
