goal under review, further dabs TBD
I think he got it with his stick after he kicked it.
That's only a hair of more of a kick than that OTT "looked like a kick" goal the other night.
data_sprite12 wrote:Nice second effort on the breakaway goal.
Nice second effort on the breakaway goal.
Thank goodness they got it, now that the bad guys have tied it up
this is where we sigh, isn't it?
Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:I missed seeing it, but she said "post" like 17 times so I'm assuming there was a Sens post?No, Calgary hit an Ottawa post, then their own. Not sure how to call that. If they put it in, we'd count it as a goal so…dab? (of course I have Sens post and NOT second post) The rules don’t specify which posts have to be hit, so.......
Cathy wrote:Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:I missed seeing it, but she said "post" like 17 times so I'm assuming there was a Sens post?No, Calgary hit an Ottawa post, then their own. Not sure how to call that. If they put it in, we'd count it as a goal so…dab? (of course I have Sens post and NOT second post)
Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:I missed seeing it, but she said "post" like 17 times so I'm assuming there was a Sens post?No, Calgary hit an Ottawa post, then their own. Not sure how to call that.
Cathy wrote:I missed seeing it, but she said "post" like 17 times so I'm assuming there was a Sens post?
I missed seeing it, but she said "post" like 17 times so I'm assuming there was a Sens post?
No, Calgary hit an Ottawa post, then their own. Not sure how to call that.
If they put it in, we'd count it as a goal so…dab?
(of course I have Sens post and NOT second post)
The rules don’t specify which posts have to be hit, so.......
I'm a little curious exactly HOW Calgary was in a position to hit the Sens post but I concur with your assessment.
tjlincoln wrote:Chabot a dumb penalty?
Chabot a dumb penalty?
I'm inclined to say no.
tjlincoln wrote:
Nah, weak call.
shorty!
Ullmark bailed out some terrible Ottawa d play there.
Lol, does that count as a second post?
Russell wrote:tjlincoln wrote:Russell wrote:tjlincoln wrote:Russell wrote:I have owned 4 Nissan’s, but I will not buy another just because of that commercial. Did you own one back when it was called Datsun? Before my driving days. It was 1986 that was only……38 years ago Ok, not quite before. I started driving in ’81. but didn’t have a Nissan until many years later. My first few cars were....special.
tjlincoln wrote:Russell wrote:tjlincoln wrote:Russell wrote:I have owned 4 Nissan’s, but I will not buy another just because of that commercial. Did you own one back when it was called Datsun? Before my driving days. It was 1986 that was only……38 years ago
Russell wrote:tjlincoln wrote:Russell wrote:I have owned 4 Nissan’s, but I will not buy another just because of that commercial. Did you own one back when it was called Datsun? Before my driving days.
tjlincoln wrote:Russell wrote:I have owned 4 Nissan’s, but I will not buy another just because of that commercial. Did you own one back when it was called Datsun?
Russell wrote:I have owned 4 Nissan’s, but I will not buy another just because of that commercial.
I have owned 4 Nissan’s, but I will not buy another just because of that commercial.
Did you own one back when it was called Datsun?
Before my driving days.
It was 1986 that was only……38 years ago
Ok, not quite before. I started driving in ’81. but didn’t have a Nissan until many years later. My first few cars were....special.
lol, “special“ is awesome
at 75% of the thread participants posting in the exact same moment.
at 75% of the thread participants posting in the exact same moment.