Schitts' Creek's Alexis is in the house.
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Has anything happened since the first minute of this period? Nope Not helping the
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Has anything happened since the first minute of this period? Nope
Cathy wrote:Has anything happened since the first minute of this period?
Has anything happened since the first minute of this period?
Nope
Not helping the
Pan @PanofSCU
@Senators
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:Screw the points, I need Stutzle to SCORE! The resemblance of that evil eye and Abby is uncanny.
Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:Screw the points, I need Stutzle to SCORE!
Cathy wrote:Screw the points, I need Stutzle to SCORE!
Screw the points, I need Stutzle to SCORE!
The resemblance of that evil eye and Abby is uncanny.
Oh, baby girl can definitely judge with her eyes!
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Holy SOG, They have 2 on 5?! I blame tj. In the last game thread he posted this....tjlincoln wrote:Ullmarks last four NHL games:37/38 - .974%19/20 - .950%31/34 - .912%36/39 - .923% Is that chrono or reverse chrono? He getting better or worse? lol
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Holy SOG, They have 2 on 5?! I blame tj. In the last game thread he posted this....tjlincoln wrote:Ullmarks last four NHL games:37/38 - .974%19/20 - .950%31/34 - .912%36/39 - .923%
Cathy wrote:Holy SOG, They have 2 on 5?!
Holy SOG,
They have 2 on 5?!
I blame tj. In the last game thread he posted this....
tjlincoln wrote:
Ullmarks last four NHL games:37/38 - .974%19/20 - .950%31/34 - .912%36/39 - .923%
Is that chrono or reverse chrono? He getting better or worse? lol
Forsberg is playing tonight, but still, the hockey gods don't get hung up on details.
The first rule of Josh Norris' shoulder…WE DON'T TALK ABOUT JOSH NORRIS' SHOULDER!
Sens PP one-timer goal in the 1st minuet of the 2nd.
Sens score on PP, in first minute
With another beautiful setup!
senior wrote:How am I going to fill in my card later if you two can't even agree on who scored first.
How am I going to fill in my card later if you two can't even agree on who scored first.
If you think the answer matters to your card we have even more problems.
That's it, I'm breaking out the caffeine. >>
Homer wrote:That 2nd Islanders goal was a deviation, or as they put it on nhl.com a tip-In
That 2nd Islanders goal was a deviation, or as they put it on nhl.com a tip-In
My card isn't impressed.
