Well there's the Refs suck
I realize that cumulative shut-out time is an interesting stat but, seriously, when did Ullmark last play against the Reds? Those 30 stopped shots have zero bearing on tonight's game.
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Was that deserved? (tea kettle was going full London bobby so I had to step away) They were intertangled, but I think Stutzle pulling the guy gown with him with a kind of facewash is what did it.
Cathy wrote:Was that deserved? (tea kettle was going full London bobby so I had to step away)
Was that deserved? (tea kettle was going full London bobby so I had to step away)
They were intertangled, but I think Stutzle pulling the guy gown with him with a kind of facewash is what did it.
Gotcha!
As I was walking away it sounded like Stutzle had the puck on a break or at least a rush and then I came back to him walking into the box. I was
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:I don't have it, but I would consider Chuckie staying out of the play and next to Carrier "doing something".Tough one. A big hit would be doing something, but not good when someone gets hurt, but he did show concern for a player. I do have that square.
Cathy wrote:I don't have it, but I would consider Chuckie staying out of the play and next to Carrier "doing something".
I don't have it, but I would consider Chuckie staying out of the play and next to Carrier "doing something".
Tough one.
A big hit would be doing something, but not good when someone gets hurt, but he did show concern for a player.
I do have that square.
I was 100% referring to the concern. He didn't even start back up the ice, I was impressed by that.
Definitely not the spirit of the square, more so a commentary on Chuckie.
Amaretto!
Well, that's one way to get it out of the zone.
Homer wrote:Ouch! That front corner angle shows what happened.
Ouch! That front corner angle shows what happened.
Double whammy
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Preds with a loud DING!We're one post aside. Pretty sure that dented the post!And screw this one aside BS, I need a second! *checks card.. I need a 2nd post and a "Refs suck" #HomerTypical.
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Preds with a loud DING!We're one post aside. Pretty sure that dented the post!And screw this one aside BS, I need a second!
Homer wrote:Preds with a loud DING!We're one post aside.
Preds with a loud DING!
We're one post aside.
Pretty sure that dented the post!
And screw this one aside BS, I need a second!
*checks card.. I need a 2nd post and a "Refs suck"
#HomerTypical.
****, did I dupe your card again?!
Homer wrote:tjlincoln wrote:Cathy wrote:Deviated G-spot sounds x-rated Throw in a Stamkos and what do you get? A good time?
tjlincoln wrote:Cathy wrote:Deviated G-spot sounds x-rated Throw in a Stamkos and what do you get?
Cathy wrote:Deviated G-spot sounds x-rated
Deviated G-spot sounds x-rated
Throw in a Stamkos and what do you get?
A good time?
🤣🤣
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Timid London Bobby? Refs suck at London Bobby Out of curiosity…did you dab Refs Suck on this? No, it's not a typical refs suck, in fact it was quite the opposite with a lack of blowing. I certainly didn't intend it when I typed it, but I now find myself in need of a particular dab.
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Timid London Bobby? Refs suck at London Bobby Out of curiosity…did you dab Refs Suck on this? No, it's not a typical refs suck, in fact it was quite the opposite with a lack of blowing.
Cathy wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Timid London Bobby? Refs suck at London Bobby Out of curiosity…did you dab Refs Suck on this?
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Timid London Bobby? Refs suck at London Bobby
Homer wrote:Timid London Bobby?
Timid London Bobby?
Refs suck at London Bobby
Out of curiosity…did you dab Refs Suck on this?
No, it's not a typical refs suck, in fact it was quite the opposite with a lack of blowing.
I certainly didn't intend it when I typed it, but I now find myself in need of a particular dab.
There's still a period to go.
Fight
