Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Lube?Even if it *was* friendly fire I feel like they would have called it against the Sens anyway.There was that one time when two leafs collided into each other taking themselves out of the play and refs called a penalty against the Sens. I'm sure Russell and Kat remember that one.
Cathy wrote:Lube?Even if it *was* friendly fire I feel like they would have called it against the Sens anyway.
Lube?
Even if it *was* friendly fire I feel like they would have called it against the Sens anyway.
There was that one time when two leafs collided into each other taking themselves out of the play and refs called a penalty against the Sens.
I'm sure Russell and Kat remember that one.
Actually, I don't but I 100% believe it.
Any formers in the game? (I'm horrible at that square)
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:You, uh, forgot something, kiddo... twss
Cathy wrote:You, uh, forgot something, kiddo...
You, uh, forgot something, kiddo...
twss
I was gonna go there but thought maybe it sounded a little too R. Kelly-ish.
Officially lube.
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:It looks like the NHL has sponsorship deals with at least 4 gambling companies: DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and PointsBet In rink advertising has Bet99, Pokerstars and JackpotCity. I think I also saw a virtual board one for a casino.It's a bit much and hypocritical to then say "bet responsibly"
Cathy wrote:It looks like the NHL has sponsorship deals with at least 4 gambling companies: DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and PointsBet
It looks like the NHL has sponsorship deals with at least 4 gambling companies: DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and PointsBet
In rink advertising has Bet99, Pokerstars and JackpotCity. I think I also saw a virtual board one for a casino.
It's a bit much and hypocritical to then say "bet responsibly"
I found a few pressers from individual teams making deals, suffice it to say they're probably *ALL* covered by one deal or another.
Cathy wrote:NO MORE FALLING AWKWARDLY!!
NO MORE FALLING AWKWARDLY!!
.........
Cathy wrote:SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:Nothing. Is. Happening. Title of your sex tape (sorry, I've been binge-watching Brooklyn 99) Sorry. Had to be said though. If it's the title of my own sex tape I suppose Nothing is Happening is marginally better than Everything is Happening. Is it though? Everything is happening sounds a little *too* slutty.
SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:Nothing. Is. Happening. Title of your sex tape (sorry, I've been binge-watching Brooklyn 99) Sorry. Had to be said though. If it's the title of my own sex tape I suppose Nothing is Happening is marginally better than Everything is Happening. Is it though?
Cathy wrote:SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:Nothing. Is. Happening. Title of your sex tape (sorry, I've been binge-watching Brooklyn 99) Sorry. Had to be said though. If it's the title of my own sex tape I suppose Nothing is Happening is marginally better than Everything is Happening.
SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:Nothing. Is. Happening. Title of your sex tape (sorry, I've been binge-watching Brooklyn 99) Sorry. Had to be said though.
Cathy wrote:SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:Nothing. Is. Happening. Title of your sex tape (sorry, I've been binge-watching Brooklyn 99)
SensKat wrote:Cathy wrote:Nothing. Is. Happening. Title of your sex tape (sorry, I've been binge-watching Brooklyn 99)
Cathy wrote:Nothing. Is. Happening.
Nothing. Is. Happening.
Title of your sex tape
(sorry, I've been binge-watching Brooklyn 99)
Sorry. Had to be said though.
If it's the title of my own sex tape I suppose Nothing is Happening is marginally better than Everything is Happening.
Is it though?
Everything is happening sounds a little *too* slutty.
you say slut, I say team player.
fair. But you know, "sex positivity" and all that jazz
Jezza!
Go on.......
Was that a breakaway?
