Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: Game 34 (2.0) - Bruins @ Sens - Tue, Dec 27, 7:00pm

Post Info
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
RE: Game 34 (2.0) - Bruins @ Sens - Tue, Dec 27, 7:00pm
Permalink  
 

2 cats!



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:

holy **** that was close


 You already dabbed that one. lol



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 

Post and in is a long shot in the SO, yeah?



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 

Spot the idiot!



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 

Batherson has 2 points.  If he gets the winner, I guess that's 3?



Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18296
Date:
Permalink  
 
tjlincoln wrote:

Talbot DESERVES to win this


 49 saves 🤦‍♂️



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 

That’s ridiculous.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:

breakaway for Chuckie?


 I thought we dabbed that already? But if not, definitely qualifies.



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
holy **** that was close

Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18296
Date:
Permalink  
 
Talbot DESERVES to win this

Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 

Even senior would like that ot.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 
senior wrote:
Homer wrote:
senior wrote:

Did we decide that the 3 on 1 qualifies as a 2 on 1?


 Well there were a couple 2-on-1s in OT, but you probably don't know that. 


 Nope. Watching football.


 Twss!



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
breakaway for Chuckie?

Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Both goalies are on fire

Pie Connoisseur
Status: Offline
Posts: 9089
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
senior wrote:

Did we decide that the 3 on 1 qualifies as a 2 on 1?


 Well there were a couple 2-on-1s in OT, but you probably don't know that. 


 Nope. Watching football.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
Homer wrote:

Kat remember to breath. 


 I'm trying!


 Twhs!



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20326
Date:
Permalink  
 
senior wrote:

Did we decide that the 3 on 1 qualifies as a 2 on 1?


 Well there were a couple 2-on-1s in OT, but you probably don't know that. 



Pie Connoisseur
Status: Offline
Posts: 9089
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
senior wrote:

Did we decide that the 3 on 1 qualifies as a 2 on 1?


 I dabbed it. But if it didn't there was a more formal 2-on-1 in OT.


 OK tks.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 22444
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

Kat remember to breath. 


 or breathe.

Do both, just to be safe!


 Twss!



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
senior wrote:

Did we decide that the 3 on 1 qualifies as a 2 on 1?


 I dabbed it. But if it didn't there was a more formal 2-on-1 in OT.



 
«First  <  1 2 3 49  >  Last»  | Page of 9  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.