Was Zigras' cross check to the head dumb?
So was it a goal disallowed/waved off
Cathy wrote:Kardinal wrote:How can it be reviewed as a goal and then reviewed as goalie interference? Way to go War Room.Wasn't called GI on the ice? Now *why* is wasn't is a whole 'other question.
Kardinal wrote:How can it be reviewed as a goal and then reviewed as goalie interference? Way to go War Room.
How can it be reviewed as a goal and then reviewed as goalie interference? Way to go War Room.
Wasn't called GI on the ice? Now *why* is wasn't is a whole 'other question.
Refs suck, pure and simple. That was a cluster you know what.
I need an oops and a fight and I have 1 bingo that counts and 1 that doesn't.
In the middle of all that is an overlapping penalty.
There was no chance that wasn’t GI.
Cathy wrote:ARE. YOU. ****ING. KIDDING. ME.
ARE. YOU. ****ING. KIDDING. ME.
Refs suck!
And high sticks aren't judged on maliciousness either.
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:who the hell is Rourke Chartier? Who ever he is, he got LUBE!
SensKat wrote:who the hell is Rourke Chartier?
who the hell is Rourke Chartier?
Who ever he is, he got LUBE!
OMFG! A whole bucket of LUBE. LMAO
But's it's getting challenged for interference.
Play under review (goal/penalty)
Lol.extra lube!
Middle linebacker by the looks of it.
Don't know, but I'm dabbing the Refs Suck on my ANA card
