Russell wrote:there's the nightly horrific giveaway by 18.
there's the nightly horrific giveaway by 18.
That could have been a "Ups, mein Fehler" if they had scored.
2 on 1
Cat is so snake bit this year.
It's always nice when the commentary is literally the phrasing of the square
Sens 2nd post
Russell wrote:that looked like a .....respectful hit by Chuckie on EK65.
that looked like a .....respectful hit by Chuckie on EK65.
yeah, he could have plastered him, but contained it by putting his arms up and absorbed the hit a bit. A good hockey hit.
holy crap that kick pass by chuckie. lmao.
Cathy wrote:Russell wrote:has hertl ever not lit us up?and that was just awful playing in the neutral zone by motte and gambrell on that goal. 9G + 1A in 15 games against OTT
Russell wrote:has hertl ever not lit us up?and that was just awful playing in the neutral zone by motte and gambrell on that goal.
has hertl ever not lit us up?
and that was just awful playing in the neutral zone by motte and gambrell on that goal.
9G + 1A in 15 games against OTT
seems like much more.
Does he think he's Peter Bondra or something?
Cathy wrote:2 in 36 seconds
2 in 36 seconds
someone got a point against his former team.
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:That had to be a deviation, right? lol I think he got the rebound?
Cathy wrote:That had to be a deviation, right? lol
That had to be a deviation, right? lol
I think he got the rebound?
I think you might be right, but they showed more angles of the celly than the goal.
It just looked like a pinball machine in there.
Its Brady's world, and we're all just getting punched in the face in it.
