2-on-1 break with a suspicious puck
tjlincoln wrote:Habs 5-2 Caulfield
Habs 5-2 Caulfield
Caulfield Goal 🥅
lol, lost puck in Allen's equipment. That has to be some kind of dab.
WHAT?! lite
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:The "Ram Studio", eh? That's unfortunate sponsorship timing given gas prices. Ram Ranch Studios? lol
Cathy wrote:The "Ram Studio", eh? That's unfortunate sponsorship timing given gas prices.
The "Ram Studio", eh? That's unfortunate sponsorship timing given gas prices.
Ram Ranch Studios? lol
Lo, unfortunate ambiguous naming as well
Homer wrote:senior wrote:Is Josh Norris now our best player? "Norris did Something"?
senior wrote:Is Josh Norris now our best player?
Is Josh Norris now our best player?
"Norris did Something"?
I don't think a "did something" player is necessarily "best player". It could be the same, buy not always.
Not exactly a high bar but he's the best player right now.
Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:On the PP, at that Do we count that as a one timer? {checks card}I vote yes. I vote yes too. ;) I usually don't have those squares when I bring something up.
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:On the PP, at that Do we count that as a one timer? {checks card}I vote yes.
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:On the PP, at that Do we count that as a one timer?
SensKat wrote:On the PP, at that
On the PP, at that
Do we count that as a one timer?
{checks card}
I vote yes.
I vote yes too. ;) I usually don't have those squares when I bring something up.
Hey, if Norris isn't going to put his damn self in the net he'd better generate other dabs!
SensKat wrote:Norris ties it up!
Norris ties it up!
Now *that's* a P I have!
