tjlincoln wrote:Cathy wrote:Russell wrote:"Tamara Lich’s husband just said he believed protesting was one of his First Amendment rights. Justice replies “What First Amendment rights?” Wait, is this real?? OMG, it is.-- Edited by Cathy on Saturday 19th of February 2022 07:54:22 PMlol, what maroons
Cathy wrote:Russell wrote:"Tamara Lich’s husband just said he believed protesting was one of his First Amendment rights. Justice replies “What First Amendment rights?” Wait, is this real?? OMG, it is.-- Edited by Cathy on Saturday 19th of February 2022 07:54:22 PM
Russell wrote:"Tamara Lich’s husband just said he believed protesting was one of his First Amendment rights. Justice replies “What First Amendment rights?”
"Tamara Lich’s husband just said he believed protesting was one of his First Amendment rights. Justice replies “What First Amendment rights?”
Wait, is this real??
OMG, it is.
-- Edited by Cathy on Saturday 19th of February 2022 07:54:22 PM
lol, what maroons
What nin cow poops.
Russell wrote:There are still small children down there. It’s very cold and crazy windy. Oh, and a near riot.
There are still small children down there. It’s very cold and crazy windy. Oh, and a near riot.
I thought they were leaving
How could I be silly enough to not make sure there was fighting square in a game against Boston.
They couldn't wait 6 seconds
SensKat wrote:boo.
boo.
Sens had all the momentum too
Russell wrote:Cathy wrote:Enough for a London Bobby before the commercial? Didn’t see it.
Cathy wrote:Enough for a London Bobby before the commercial?
Enough for a London Bobby before the commercial?
Didn’t see it.
Well it's a sound thing not a visual thing...
Cathy wrote:SensKat wrote:Sens 1st PP Oh that's right, I was thinking that false alarm penalty was a real penalty
SensKat wrote:Sens 1st PP
Sens 1st PP
Oh that's right, I was thinking that false alarm penalty was a real penalty
Undab
SensKat wrote:Russell wrote:SensKat wrote:Sens 1st PP Didn’t they have a penalty in the first! Nope, no penalties at all in the 1st. It has not been an exciting game.
Russell wrote:SensKat wrote:Sens 1st PP Didn’t they have a penalty in the first!
Didn’t they have a penalty in the first!
Nope, no penalties at all in the 1st. It has not been an exciting game.
10 4
The Sens need to fight like THIS more often, coming away with another PP.
SensKat wrote:Fight
Fight
lid
SensKat wrote:Russell wrote:Didn’t the sens have a 2 on 1 in the first? Maybe? I'm not really super paying attention, as you may have figured out....
Russell wrote:Didn’t the sens have a 2 on 1 in the first?
Didn’t the sens have a 2 on 1 in the first?
Maybe? I'm not really super paying attention, as you may have figured out....
Not that I recall, not that my recall is superb right now.
