Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:There's a beat the icing. You gonna retract this statement in 5 minutes?
Homer wrote:There's a beat the icing.
There's a beat the icing.
You gonna retract this statement in 5 minutes?
it's not tracked on the summary so I can't
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:The Habs look tired Long change doesn't help when other team is controlling play.
SensKat wrote:The Habs look tired
The Habs look tired
Long change doesn't help when other team is controlling play.
Shots 9-0 leafs
One cigar. Going for 3.
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:These OTs are much less stressful than Sens' OT Yep, I'm still breathing Leafs have been controlling the play so far in OT
SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:These OTs are much less stressful than Sens' OT Yep, I'm still breathing
Homer wrote:These OTs are much less stressful than Sens' OT
These OTs are much less stressful than Sens' OT
Yep, I'm still breathing
Leafs have been controlling the play so far in OT
Yep, but so often you see it happen that one team controls, and the other team just gets on chance and they score
One could also say the Leafs were controlling the series when it was 3-1.
senior wrote:Has anyone ever got the beat the icing square?
Has anyone ever got the beat the icing square?
I've dabbed it once or twice, not sure if it was TOR/MTL or a carryover play.
I would really like to see it tonight though.
dabbed it a couple times including the test cards before the Habs/Leafs series started.
I don't think so. We might want to remove that one for round 2.
Cathy wrote:I like that this one needs no modification...
I like that this one needs no modification...
lol
SensKat wrote:Overtime
Overtime
3 point night square is now dead, unless someone does a really, really amazing assist and goal on the same play
SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:oh.... does that first Montreal goal count as goalie screened? lol I don't remember it. The one they challenged, where everyone EXCEPT the goalie was in the crease. he wasn't even in the line of fire.. lol but he was definitely screened.... he was just on the wrong side of the door
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:oh.... does that first Montreal goal count as goalie screened? lol I don't remember it. The one they challenged, where everyone EXCEPT the goalie was in the crease. he wasn't even in the line of fire.. lol
SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:oh.... does that first Montreal goal count as goalie screened? lol I don't remember it. The one they challenged, where everyone EXCEPT the goalie was in the crease.
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:oh.... does that first Montreal goal count as goalie screened? lol I don't remember it.
SensKat wrote:oh.... does that first Montreal goal count as goalie screened? lol
oh.... does that first Montreal goal count as goalie screened? lol
I don't remember it.
The one they challenged, where everyone EXCEPT the goalie was in the crease.
he wasn't even in the line of fire.. lol
but he was definitely screened.... he was just on the wrong side of the door
