Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Sens Callups → Sens Callups → senscallups → Leafs @ Habs - Game 3 - Monday, May 24, 7:00 p.m
 

Topic: Leafs @ Habs - Game 3 - Monday, May 24, 7:00 p.m

Post Info
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
RE: Leafs @ Habs - Game 3 - Monday, May 24, 7:00 p.m
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:

visiting team outshoots in the 1st. Game tied after 1.

 I don't have those.
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
SensKat wrote:
Homer wrote:

penalty overlap.   I should just rename the square to that. 

Also dump penalty?

 I have dumb penalty, can I dab that instead?

 I meant renaming "Penalty called while one being served" to Penalty Overlap, which it was. 

Dumb penalty because it was offside play and late hit after whistle. 

 re-read your post more carefully :)
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12452
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
SensKat wrote:
Homer wrote:

penalty overlap.   I should just rename the square to that. 

Also dump penalty?

 I have dumb penalty, can I dab that instead?

 I meant renaming "Penalty called while one being served" to Penalty Overlap, which it was. 

Dumb penalty because it was offside play and late hit after whistle. 

 Whoosh!
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
those rates.ca commercials are weirdly disturbing

Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12452
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
SensKat wrote:

I think I sunburned my scalp today

 Ouch

 Unofficial start of summer.
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
Homer wrote:

penalty overlap.   I should just rename the square to that. 

Also dump penalty?

 I have dumb penalty, can I dab that instead?

 I meant renaming "Penalty called while one being served" to Penalty Overlap, which it was. 

Dumb penalty because it was offside play and late hit after whistle. 
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12452
Date:
Permalink  
 

So, Canada, you guys planning on winning *a* game in Latvia?
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
visiting team outshoots in the 1st. Game tied after 1.

Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:

I think I sunburned my scalp today

 Ouch
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

penalty overlap.   I should just rename the square to that. 

Also dump penalty?

 I have dumb penalty, can I dab that instead?
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
Permalink  
 

penalty overlap.   I should just rename the square to that. 

Also dump penalty?
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
I think I sunburned my scalp today

Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12452
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:

nope, he got it:

twitter.com/NHLGIFs/status/1396973092577193986

 The dab was nice while it lasted.
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
SensKat wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

 Shoulda had that, amazing *move* but nothing to save since Spezza shot it high

 You think so?

 The replay looked like it went right over the net, not deflected by Price.

SHOT TOR ONGOAL - #19 SPEZZA, Wrist, Off. Zone, 9 ft.

STOP PUCK IN NETTING

MTL won Def. Zone - TOR #15 KERFOOT vs MTL #14 SUZUKI

If it was straight over and in netting, faceoff would have been in neutral zone?

 

 

 
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12452
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

 Shoulda had that, amazing *move* but nothing to save since Spezza shot it high

 Faceoff was in the Montreal end, so Price would have gotten at least a piece of it?

 Well, I switched to a non-pixelated, but also non-rewindable feed so I've used up all my available views. lol
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
nope, he got it:

twitter.com/NHLGIFs/status/1396973092577193986
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12452
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

 Shoulda had that, amazing *move* but nothing to save since Spezza shot it high

 You think so?

 The replay looked like it went right over the net, not deflected by Price.
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

 Shoulda had that, amazing *move* but nothing to save since Spezza shot it high

 Faceoff was in the Montreal end, so Price would have gotten at least a piece of it?
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

 Shoulda had that, amazing *move* but nothing to save since Spezza shot it high

 You think so?
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

 let's go with Amazing Save.  We haven't dabbed that one yet.
 
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.