Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: Vegas - Wild Thread

Post Info
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Vegas - Wild Thread
Permalink  
 

I know we've gone around on it, but maybe we should put Fight back in

Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Double minor square?


 I was thinking about that one. 


Unlikely to be anything other than high-sticking but we are heavy on the scoring squares so another PIM-based square can't hurt.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20327
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Double minor square?


 I was thinking about that one. 


 Would be when it results in 4 min PP and not one player gets 4 and player on other team gets 2?



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Eyeballing the 2020 playoffs, win by 3+ happened about as often as OT. Kat brings up a good point about back-loading the cards.

What about {team} leads after 1st? (I'm trying to think of ways to force early dabs)


 so "Home team leads after 1" or "Game tied after 1" or both instead of "one goal win"

Both games this morning/afternoon would be tied after 1. 


I'm not in love with it, but it does force the dab/no dab early. Tied after 1 in this game is a double dab with goal-free too. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20327
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

Double minor square?


 I was thinking about that one. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20327
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

Eyeballing the 2020 playoffs, win by 3+ happened about as often as OT. Kat brings up a good point about back-loading the cards.

What about {team} leads after 1st? (I'm trying to think of ways to force early dabs)


 so "Home team leads after 1" or "Game tied after 1" or both instead of "one goal win"

Both games this morning/afternoon would be tied after 1. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 

Double minor square?



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
SensKat wrote:
Homer wrote:

So far I'm batting .500 on Bingos. 

Might need a few more tweaks.  We can't make it too easy.

Change "one goal game" to either "win by 2 goals" or "win by 3+" goals since one goal game becomes a double dab with OT. 

I think 1st round last year was 55% one goal games.  2 goal wins=9 and 3+ goal wins=10 

Was thinking of adding "beat the icing" square" 

 


 Hmmm.  I also don't want to back-load the cards too much where we are waiting for all the dabs to happen at the end of the game. 

Do we have a "well THAT was dumb" square? :)


Might need to make a 1 or two squares "Home Team" instead of both. Losing the Sens Player specific squares to make it more generic adds a lot of dabs. Cathy and I are batting .500.

4 corner bingo is also in play too, so an extra way to get a bingo. 


 I'm at .667, only played one card yesterday.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

switching back to living room

Card #1

Card #2


 LOL, *now* I understand why you posted your cards when you relocated before.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 

Eyeballing the 2020 playoffs, win by 3+ happened about as often as OT. Kat brings up a good point about back-loading the cards.

What about {team} leads after 1st? (I'm trying to think of ways to force early dabs)



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20327
Date:
Permalink  
 

switching back to living room

Card #1

Card #2



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20327
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
Homer wrote:

So far I'm batting .500 on Bingos. 

Might need a few more tweaks.  We can't make it too easy.

Change "one goal game" to either "win by 2 goals" or "win by 3+" goals since one goal game becomes a double dab with OT. 

I think 1st round last year was 55% one goal games.  2 goal wins=9 and 3+ goal wins=10 

Was thinking of adding "beat the icing" square" 

 


 Hmmm.  I also don't want to back-load the cards too much where we are waiting for all the dabs to happen at the end of the game. 

Do we have a "well THAT was dumb" square? :)


Might need to make a 1 or two squares "Home Team" instead of both. Losing the Sens Player specific squares to make it more generic adds a lot of dabs. Cathy and I are batting .500.

4 corner bingo is also in play too, so an extra way to get a bingo. 



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
and goal-free period

Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Home team outshoots in the 1st

Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

So far I'm batting .500 on Bingos. 

Might need a few more tweaks.  We can't make it too easy.

Change "one goal game" to either "win by 2 goals" or "win by 3+" goals since one goal game becomes a double dab with OT. 

I think 1st round last year was 55% one goal games.  2 goal wins=9 and 3+ goal wins=10 

Was thinking of adding "beat the icing" square"

 

 

 


 Hmmm.  I also don't want to back-load the cards too much where we are waiting for all the dabs to happen at the end of the game.

 

Do we have a "well THAT was dumb" square? :)



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
SensKat wrote:

Stone and Lehner are the only former Sens in this series, right?


LOL, I'm totally relying on you guys for that square.


 I think those are the only ones. No Wild ex-Sens. 


Only passive ex-Sens? The puns are going to abound in this series.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

So far I'm batting .500 on Bingos. 

Might need a few more tweaks.  We can't make it too easy.

Change "one goal game" to either "win by 2 goals" or "win by 3+" goals since one goal game becomes a double dab with OT. 

I think 1st round last year was 55% one goal games.  2 goal wins=9 and 3+ goal wins=10 

Was thinking of adding "beat the icing" square" 


We need this game to end in regulation for a good test. I was 10 and 7 dabs going into OT, then bingo'd on both cards with OT. (And I didn't bingo yesterday)



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20327
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
SensKat wrote:

Stone and Lehner are the only former Sens in this series, right?


LOL, I'm totally relying on you guys for that square.


 I think those are the only ones. No Wild ex-Sens. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 20327
Date:
Permalink  
 

So far I'm batting .500 on Bingos. 

Might need a few more tweaks.  We can't make it too easy.

Change "one goal game" to either "win by 2 goals" or "win by 3+" goals since one goal game becomes a double dab with OT. 

I think 1st round last year was 55% one goal games.  2 goal wins=9 and 3+ goal wins=10 

Was thinking of adding "beat the icing" square"

 

 

 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13072
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:

Stone and Lehner are the only former Sens in this series, right?


LOL, I'm totally relying on you guys for that square.



 
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.