Russell wrote:

---

senior wrote:

---

Did the Canucks hit a post? And is Stuetzle goal considered a slump breaker?

---

 you just woke up on the couch, didn't you?

---

 Actually was watching a movie and forgot about the game.

senior wrote:

---

Did the Canucks hit a post? And is Stuetzle goal considered a slump breaker?

---

 you just woke up on the couch, didn't you?

senior wrote:

---

Did the Canucks hit a post? And is Stuetzle goal considered a slump breaker?

---

 Not yet, and yes

Cathy wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

Nice to see Murray making solid saves.

---

 It's that lovely paradox, happy to see goalie making good saves...but you wish he wasn't in the position that he needed to.

---

 not to mention, maybe we need to lose most of these final games. we're crawling out of the the bottom 5. 

that was a stupid penalty by brown. 

tjlincoln wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

When is it safe to start believing in Murray?

---

 The answer is always "at least one more game"

---

 He’s had to redo his game, it’s taking time and hopefully it’s coming around. He couldn’t keep doing what got him those 2 Cups. That being said Seattle ain’t taking 3 years at 6.25 so don’t protect him in expansion draft 

---

 Yeah, they need to protect one of the young guys.... I just have no idea which one at this point.  It's been a ridiculous year of tiny sample sizes behind a terrible team.

SensKat wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

When is it safe to start believing in Murray?

---

 The answer is always "at least one more game"

---

 He’s had to redo his game, it’s taking time and hopefully it’s coming around. He couldn’t keep doing what got him those 2 Cups. That being said Seattle ain’t taking 3 years at 6.25 so don’t protect him in expansion draft