Members Login
 

Topic: Game 47 - Sens @ Canucks - Thu Apr 22, 10:00pm

Post Info
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13608
Date:
RE: Game 47 - Sens @ Canucks - Thu Apr 22, 10:00pm
Permalink  
 

REFS SUCK! OBVIOUS TRIP!



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 18652
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

What's the geopolitical temperature re: Beijing '22? Boycott in the realm of possibility?


 I don't think we'll see boycotts, but I can see participation, and certainly attendance being much lower



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13608
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

What's the geopolitical temperature re: Beijing '22? Boycott in the realm of possibility?


it really seems......wrong, somehow, that China should be able to host the olympics when its now pretty clear their attempts to cover up the early days of the virus caused a global catastrophe. shouldn't they have to be accountable, somehow? 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 1495
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:

Chabot should NOT go to the worlds. he's played way too much already and its not worth the covid risk. 


Worlds seems insane on multiple levels. For anyone. Everyone.

Making in through a highly time-compressed schedule without injury to roll the dice with a highly time-compressed international tourney whose anew doesn't start with "O-lim" and end with "pics"? 

Yeah, no.



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 18652
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:

Chabot should NOT go to the worlds. he's played way too much already and its not worth the covid risk. 


 I would tend to agree.  Plus I'm fairly sure he's playing injured.  Take the time off.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 1495
Date:
Permalink  
 

What's the geopolitical temperature re: Beijing '22? Boycott in the realm of possibility?



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13608
Date:
Permalink  
 

Chabot should NOT go to the worlds. he's played way too much already and its not worth the covid risk. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 1495
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Who are these guys in white decisively entering the offensive zone??


 Same guys that just tripped on the trapezoid


Gotta keep the fans humble. 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 13608
Date:
Permalink  
 

player starts interview answer with "yeah, no." Dab.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 1495
Date:
Permalink  
 

OTT

10-1-1 when leading after two periods

 

VAN

3-16-2 when trailing after two periods

 



Pie Connoisseur
Status: Offline
Posts: 6899
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
senior wrote:
SensKat wrote:
senior wrote:
Russell wrote:
senior wrote:

Did the Canucks hit a post? And is Stuetzle goal considered a slump breaker?


 you just woke up on the couch, didn't you?


 Actually was watching a movie and forgot about the game.


 Do you need a card check?


 Sure if you don't mind. Think I got most of them.


 This is what I have for you:

 

http://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=qVmYjTIUrnRLdeAkWBoQGDsJ&scored=800320&bname=senior

 


 Thanks.



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 18652
Date:
Permalink  
 

Outshot in the 2nd



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 18652
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

Who are these guys in white decisively entering the offensive zone??


 Same guys that just tripped on the trapezoid



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 1495
Date:
Permalink  
 

Who are these guys in white decisively entering the offensive zone??



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 18652
Date:
Permalink  
 
Considering the number of dabs in the first.... the second has been awfully dead

Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 18652
Date:
Permalink  
 
senior wrote:
SensKat wrote:
senior wrote:
Russell wrote:
senior wrote:

Did the Canucks hit a post? And is Stuetzle goal considered a slump breaker?


 you just woke up on the couch, didn't you?


 Actually was watching a movie and forgot about the game.


 Do you need a card check?


 Sure if you don't mind. Think I got most of them.


 This is what I have for you:

 

http://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=qVmYjTIUrnRLdeAkWBoQGDsJ&scored=800320&bname=senior

 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 1495
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:
Cathy wrote:
SensKat wrote:

Nice to see Murray making solid saves.


 It's that lovely paradox, happy to see goalie making good saves...but you wish he wasn't in the position that he needed to.


 not to mention, maybe we need to lose most of these final games. we're crawling out of the the bottom 5. 


 It wouldn't be a true tank season if there wasn't a last-minute, yet ultimately useless, points grab late in the season.



Pie Connoisseur
Status: Offline
Posts: 6899
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
senior wrote:
Russell wrote:
senior wrote:

Did the Canucks hit a post? And is Stuetzle goal considered a slump breaker?


 you just woke up on the couch, didn't you?


 Actually was watching a movie and forgot about the game.


 Do you need a card check?


 Sure if you don't mind. Think I got most of them.



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 18652
Date:
Permalink  
 
ok, someone definitely turned off the Kat filter. Be warned.... I can post even more now.

Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 18652
Date:
Permalink  
 
senior wrote:
Russell wrote:
senior wrote:

Did the Canucks hit a post? And is Stuetzle goal considered a slump breaker?


 you just woke up on the couch, didn't you?


 Actually was watching a movie and forgot about the game.


 Do you need a card check?



 
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 611  >  Last»  | Page of 11  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.