Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:Torts: Refs Suck!Wow that was bizarre. the thing in Columbus, or Russell arguing against Lube? Carolina used up most of the lube on a single play, the rest of it now has to be rationed.
SensKat wrote:Homer wrote:Torts: Refs Suck!Wow that was bizarre. the thing in Columbus, or Russell arguing against Lube?
Homer wrote:Torts: Refs Suck!Wow that was bizarre.
Torts: Refs Suck!
Wow that was bizarre.
the thing in Columbus, or Russell arguing against Lube?
Carolina used up most of the lube on a single play, the rest of it now has to be rationed.
Typical of the NHL giving all of the Lube to American teams, it's like the Canadian division doesn't even exist.
Homer wrote:Ref giving Matt Murray a warning for interference on McDavid.That's Lube?
Ref giving Matt Murray a warning for interference on McDavid.
That's Lube?
eeeeennnnhhhhhh. not quite. A third time will need lube.
SensKat wrote:Saved by the buzzer! Holy crap, even more don't let McDavid loose like that!
Saved by the buzzer! Holy crap, even more don't let McDavid loose like that!
That's not what she said.
almost a breakaway
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:Is this the first penalty? Sens already got the 1st penalty earlier. Chabot for tripping.
SensKat wrote:Is this the first penalty?
Is this the first penalty?
Sens already got the 1st penalty earlier. Chabot for tripping.
wow, how did I miss that?
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:4-3 now. They took one away from the Oilers.Wonder if anyone reviews the overhead cam to check if it was a SOG and not going wide. Posts are not considered SOGs.Which makes you wonder if a shot from the low corner that deviates off a defenceman counts as a SOG.
SensKat wrote:4-3 now. They took one away from the Oilers.
4-3 now. They took one away from the Oilers.
Wonder if anyone reviews the overhead cam to check if it was a SOG and not going wide. Posts are not considered SOGs.
Which makes you wonder if a shot from the low corner that deviates off a defenceman counts as a SOG.
The way I've always heard it is "if it would go in the net if it was empty, it's a SOG"
Homer wrote:SensKat wrote:hmmmm.... so I asked on an Oilers forum if Smith is the backup, and so far the consensus is "they are both backups" So the optimistic fan would say 1A and 1B, while the pessimistic fan would say 2A and 2B?
SensKat wrote:hmmmm.... so I asked on an Oilers forum if Smith is the backup, and so far the consensus is "they are both backups"
hmmmm.... so I asked on an Oilers forum if Smith is the backup, and so far the consensus is "they are both backups"
So the optimistic fan would say 1A and 1B, while the pessimistic fan would say 2A and 2B?
2A and 2B is the answer, apparently. lol
