Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Sens Callups → Sens Callups → senscallups → Game 14 - Wings vs Sens in Sweden - Thu Nov 16, 2:00 pm
 

Topic: Game 14 - Wings vs Sens in Sweden - Thu Nov 16, 2:00 pm

Post Info
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
RE: Game 14 - Wings vs Sens in Sweden - Thu Nov 16, 2:00 pm
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Lol, you guys with your quads and I **really** want to argue the floater save as AYKM.

 Well if there's funny **** going on then it's a quad, if not it's a tripple. 

I don't recall the AYFM floater save, but missed 2/3 periods. 

Wait, AYFM save?

twss?

 

HA! 

 Oops, slip of the tongue .  
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21781
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Lol, you guys with your quads and I **really** want to argue the floater save as AYKM.

 Well if there's funny **** going on then it's a quad, if not it's a tripple. 

I don't recall the AYFM floater save, but missed 2/3 periods. 

Wait, AYFM save?

twss?

 

HA! 
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12468
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Lol, you guys with your quads and I **really** want to argue the floater save as AYKM.

 Well if there's funny **** going on then it's a quad, if not it's a tripple. 

I don't recall the AYFM floater save, but missed 2/3 periods. 

Wait, AYFM save?

twss?

 
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12468
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Lol, you guys with your quads and I **really** want to argue the floater save as AYKM.

 Well if there's funny **** going on then it's a quad, if not it's a tripple. 

I don't recall the AYFM floater save, but missed 2/3 periods. 

I can't find a clip but it right before the Sens first goal, so the floater was ~14:30 of the 1st. MJ hits a different octave with "He put the glove up!"

The reason I thought it had AYKM potential was because of the Gudas goal from the other night. It was like Korps saw that film and said, "Nope, not gonna happen to me!"

 
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

Lol, you guys with your quads and I **really** want to argue the floater save as AYKM.

 Well if there's funny **** going on then it's a quad, if not it's a tripple. 

I don't recall the AYFM floater save, but missed 2/3 periods. 
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12468
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lol, you guys with your quads and I **really** want to argue the floater save as AYKM.



Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12468
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Woo Hoo

Woo Hoo

double bingo

final card

Okay, wait, Homer…what's the ruling on waived off?

 I think it should count, but I may be biased.  2 Bingos, vs 4. 

 Triple bingo

final card

Was there a "funny ****" dab?  I thought I it in the thread, but not dabbed on your card.

 I asked about something…don't remember what…please hold

 Might have been the puck breaking the camera?

 Oh yeah, yeah, yeah!! That was it.
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12468
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:

Funny ****?

 Lol, I didn't include any context so I have no ****ing idea what I was asking about.
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Woo Hoo

Woo Hoo

double bingo

final card

Okay, wait, Homer…what's the ruling on waived off?

 I think it should count, but I may be biased.  2 Bingos, vs 4. 

 Triple bingo

final card

Was there a "funny ****" dab?  I thought I it in the thread, but not dabbed on your card.

 I asked about something…don't remember what…please hold

 Might have been the puck breaking the camera?
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12468
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:

Woo Hoo

Woo Hoo

double bingo

final card

Okay, wait, Homer…what's the ruling on waived off?

 I think it should count, but I may be biased.  2 Bingos, vs 4. 

 Triple bingo

final card

Was there a "funny ****" dab?  I thought I it in the thread, but not dabbed on your card.

 I asked about something…don't remember what…please hold
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12468
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

 So a goal was scored and disallowed because it wasn't legal? Puck went over the line, called no goal.

Review wasn't that puck didn't cross the line? Reviewed to confirm no goal.

Should be a dab? {shrug}

 

 I think it should.... :/ 

call on the ice was no goal. It was reviewed and confirmed no goal. So, there was no goal to reverse.  

 Which is the "waived off" part, right? I'm so confused now.
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21781
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Russell wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

 So a goal was scored and disallowed because it wasn't legal? Puck went over the line, called no goal.

Review wasn't that puck didn't cross the line? Reviewed to confirm no goal.

Should be a dab? {shrug}

 

 I think it should.... :/ 

call on the ice was no goal. It was reviewed and confirmed no goal. So, there was no goal to reverse.  

 Yeah but when a goal in scored with a high stick and waved off we dab as no goal. It's not always result of a review. 

If time expired or long after a whistle, then I think we didn't dab. 

Sold! quadruple for me. smile 
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

 So a goal was scored and disallowed because it wasn't legal? Puck went over the line, called no goal.

Review wasn't that puck didn't cross the line? Reviewed to confirm no goal.

Should be a dab? {shrug}

 

 I think it should.... :/ 

call on the ice was no goal. It was reviewed and confirmed no goal. So, there was no goal to reverse.  

 Yeah but when a goal in scored with a high stick and waved off we dab as no goal. It's not always result of a review. 

If time expired or long after a whistle, then I think we didn't dab. 
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21781
Date:
Permalink  
 
tjlincoln wrote:
Russell wrote:
tjlincoln wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Russell wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Russell wrote:

oh, we also have a goal disallowed/waived off. 

dangerously close to EVERYTHING IS HAPPENING!

 Does that count? The call on the ice was no-goal. I forget the fine print on that dab.

good point. no dab.  

 What was the circumstances of this one?  If a goal is put in with a high stick and waved off immediately, we count it as a dab. 

 Goalie pushed in. (right?)

 So a goal was scored and disallowed because it wasn't legal?  Review wasn't that puck didn't cross the line? Should be a dab?

 pushed in 

 twss

 mmmmm….I knew that was going to happen

That too. 
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21781
Date:
Permalink  
 

Triple cigar

https://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=BoIqCbWQAPhmFcgkanORKjHE&scored=31251063&bname=Russell

 

Or, if we're allowing the waived off/reviewed goal, quadruple. 
tjlincoln
Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18073
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:
tjlincoln wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Russell wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Russell wrote:

oh, we also have a goal disallowed/waived off. 

dangerously close to EVERYTHING IS HAPPENING!

 Does that count? The call on the ice was no-goal. I forget the fine print on that dab.

good point. no dab.  

 What was the circumstances of this one?  If a goal is put in with a high stick and waved off immediately, we count it as a dab. 

 Goalie pushed in. (right?)

 So a goal was scored and disallowed because it wasn't legal?  Review wasn't that puck didn't cross the line? Should be a dab?

 pushed in 

 twss

 mmmmm….I knew that was going to happen



Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21781
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

 So a goal was scored and disallowed because it wasn't legal? Puck went over the line, called no goal.

Review wasn't that puck didn't cross the line? Reviewed to confirm no goal.

Should be a dab? {shrug}

 

 I think it should.... :/ 

call on the ice was no goal. It was reviewed and confirmed no goal. So, there was no goal to reverse.  
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21781
Date:
Permalink  
 
tjlincoln wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Russell wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Russell wrote:

oh, we also have a goal disallowed/waived off. 

dangerously close to EVERYTHING IS HAPPENING!

 Does that count? The call on the ice was no-goal. I forget the fine print on that dab.

good point. no dab.  

 What was the circumstances of this one?  If a goal is put in with a high stick and waved off immediately, we count it as a dab. 

 Goalie pushed in. (right?)

 So a goal was scored and disallowed because it wasn't legal?  Review wasn't that puck didn't cross the line? Should be a dab?

 pushed in 

 twss
tjlincoln
Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18073
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
tjlincoln wrote:

AYKM goal I do believe

 Definitely!!

 

You got the correct score and I got the game winner.

 You just took the lead in the standings too
senior
Pie Connoisseur
Status: Offline
Posts: 9016
Date:
Permalink  
 

Based on comments in the thread, one cigar and a couple of almosts: https://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=iRkaZWgLeGbqFmYPfHcTBrDp&scored=14653771&bname=senior
 
1 2 3 … 11  >  Last»  | Page of 11  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.