Russell wrote:

---

Wasn’t that interference on Joseph?

---

 Apparently…not. 

Wasn’t that interference on Joseph?

At the moment, my card looks like a drunken clown. 

Russell wrote:

---

I Cathy wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

That’s some funny ****!

---

 Tanev's ankles?

---

 Yep

---

I think that's a stretch. The bobblehead on the other hand...

---

It was more the dance he was doing after the second hit ankle. 

---

 My card is so bad my only hope is you go to bed before the end of the game.

Kardinal wrote:

---

Gotta feel for Sogaard and Chabot on that one — save is made, rebound hits Chabot and in our net for a SHG after that short handed break caused by the puck hitting the ref.

---

 My bad, ask Canuck.

Russell wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

That’s some funny ****!

---

 Tanev's ankles?

---

 Yep

---

I think that's a stretch. The bobblehead on the other hand...

Cathy wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

That’s some funny ****!

---

 Tanev's ankles?

---

 Yep

Russell wrote:

---

That’s some funny ****!

---

 Tanev's ankles?

In that arena, when Schultz gets a penalty, if they don’t play the bugs bunny “SCHULTZ! OFFICE!” , they are missing a golden opportunity.