Homer wrote:Cathy wrote:Tkachuk 3-point gameSure, technically it's 2/3 and 1/3.It's official now.
Cathy wrote:Tkachuk 3-point gameSure, technically it's 2/3 and 1/3.
Tkachuk 3-point game
Sure, technically it's 2/3 and 1/3.
It's official now.
Maybe not, Sens are challenging for an offside.
Ouch. Saw that one a split second before it happened.
3-point night, for reals
it had to happen. that was hegemony.
Russell wrote:60+ shots against is nto good, right?
60+ shots against is nto good, right?
The spouse isn't even that bad.
ok, I need more from Strudel. He's not being a game changer like he's supposed to be.
Cathy wrote:Is that's roughing then the previous Kastelic "roughings" were MMA fights.
Is that's roughing then the previous Kastelic "roughings" were MMA fights.
Sens reaction
Cathy wrote:Homer wrote:Russell wrote:did they say the FLA goal was post and in? i think i heard them say that. Just checked the replay and it was. Does that count as 2nd post also or no?
Homer wrote:Russell wrote:did they say the FLA goal was post and in? i think i heard them say that. Just checked the replay and it was.
Russell wrote:did they say the FLA goal was post and in? i think i heard them say that.
did they say the FLA goal was post and in? i think i heard them say that.
Just checked the replay and it was.
Does that count as 2nd post also or no?
No
Okay, THAT'S overlapping.
nothing on the PxP
SensKat wrote:that one has to be a fight, right?
that one has to be a fight, right?
Nope, roughing again
ok, I'll vacuum for her during the int. Now we're eve.
tjlincoln wrote:shoulda challenged?
shoulda challenged?
don;'t think so. It looked good.
I'm heading out, so leaving my current card here for later check.
