Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Sens Callups → Sens Callups → senscallups → Game 65 - ***** Cats @ Sens, Sat Mar 26, 7:00pm
 

Topic: Game 65 - ***** Cats @ Sens, Sat Mar 26, 7:00pm

Post Info
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
RE: Game 65 - ***** Cats @ Sens, Sat Mar 26, 7:00pm
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

There was a 2nd post for the Panthers there.

What else gets dabbed?

Refs suck?  AYKM goal, AYKM Goal lite?

 Did we already do deviation?

 we don't usually count the goalie as a deviation.

 Well, be one definition, he put it in the net himself.

 can't blame the refs for that one. war room sucks.  



-- Edited by Russell on Saturday 26th of March 2022 08:49:17 PM

 Who are you and what have you done with Russell?
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21779
Date:
Permalink  
 

Sens DJ playing lots of Foo Fighters tonight. 
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21779
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

There was a 2nd post for the Panthers there.

What else gets dabbed?

Refs suck?  AYKM goal, AYKM Goal lite?

 Did we already do deviation?

 we don't usually count the goalie as a deviation.

 Well, be one definition, he put it in the net himself.

 can't blame the refs for that one. war room sucks.  



-- Edited by Russell on Saturday 26th of March 2022 08:49:17 PM

Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12455
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

There was a 2nd post for the Panthers there.

What else gets dabbed?

Refs suck?  AYKM goal, AYKM Goal lite?

 Did we already do deviation?

 we don't usually count the goalie as a deviation.

 Well, be one definition, he put it in the net himself.



Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12455
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:
Kardinal wrote:

I’m only on radio, so I’m going with what Dean and Gord have been taking about. That is a goal even though the puck isn’t visible and the entire glove didn’t cross the line???

 Yes.  The last visible sighting of the puck is it bouncing off Gus's back.  He then traps it against his back with his glove, which may or may not have been across the line.  But you can't actually SEE the puck

 

I think logical deduction says it's over the line, given the "cuppy" part of the glove is inside the net. But, yes, you can't actually SEE that and "logical deduction" have never counted as a goal before.
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

There was a 2nd post for the Panthers there.

What else gets dabbed?

Refs suck?  AYKM goal, AYKM Goal lite?

 No 2nd post showing in the game summary.

 

I guess if we expand the definition of Refs that might count
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:

There was a 2nd post for the Panthers there.

What else gets dabbed?

Refs suck?  AYKM goal, AYKM Goal lite?

 Did we already do deviation?

 we don't usually count the goalie as a deviation.
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
Kardinal wrote:

I’m only on radio, so I’m going with what Dean and Gord have been taking about. That is a goal even though the puck isn’t visible and the entire glove didn’t cross the line???

 Yes.  The last visible sighting of the puck is it bouncing off Gus's back.  He then traps it against his back with his glove, which may or may not have been across the line.  But you can't actually SEE the puck
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12455
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:

There was a 2nd post for the Panthers there.

What else gets dabbed?

Refs suck?  AYKM goal, AYKM Goal lite?

 Did we already do deviation?
Kardinal
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 4048
Date:
Permalink  
 
Also, 2 goals in 62 seconds.

Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
Permalink  
 

There was a 2nd post for the Panthers there.

What else gets dabbed?

Refs suck?  AYKM goal, AYKM Goal lite?
Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21779
Date:
Permalink  
 
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
SensKat wrote:

interesting call

 no lube.

 no lube = refs suck, does it not?

 its certainly uncomfortable. I saw nothing conclusive there. 
Kardinal
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 4048
Date:
Permalink  
 
I’m only on radio, so I’m going with what Dean and Gord have been taking about. That is a goal even though the puck isn’t visible and the entire glove didn’t cross the line???

Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12455
Date:
Permalink  
 

War room sucks?
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12455
Date:
Permalink  
 
Homer wrote:
SensKat wrote:

interesting call

 no lube.

 no lube = refs suck, does it not?
Homer
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 19791
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:

interesting call

 no lube.
Cathy
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 12455
Date:
Permalink  
 

AYFKM??

 

How is that conclusive?!
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
interesting call

Russell
Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21779
Date:
Permalink  
 
SensKat wrote:

wow.... that's a weird one

 twss
SensKat
Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
wow.... that's a weird one

 
«First  <  1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 10  >  Last»  | Page of 10  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.