SensKat wrote:tjlincoln wrote:Do you guys think Smith is a good coach? I do, but I thought Cameron Clouston and MacLean were off to good starts Yeah, he's doing fine, but I need a bigger sample size to say "good". We haven't seen how he will deal with any kind of adversity yet.
tjlincoln wrote:Do you guys think Smith is a good coach? I do, but I thought Cameron Clouston and MacLean were off to good starts
Do you guys think Smith is a good coach? I do, but I thought Cameron Clouston and MacLean were off to good starts
Yeah, he's doing fine, but I need a bigger sample size to say "good". We haven't seen how he will deal with any kind of adversity yet.
I like that he has them working hard, working on the basics and seems to hold the players responsible.
Russell wrote:That’s twice now in the last couple of games that refs missed calls have cost us goals against.
That’s twice now in the last couple of games that refs missed calls have cost us goals against.
refs suck?
5 for me.
SensKat wrote:I have one dab so far. I have a REALLY crappy card tonight.
I have one dab so far. I have a REALLY crappy card tonight.
I got 5. I think.
Homer wrote:Kardinal reviews the thread. "WTF is a dab and what's not a dab?"
Kardinal reviews the thread.
"WTF is a dab and what's not a dab?"
Then.......bingo!
Sens were NOT outshot in the 1st, no dab for anyone on that.
SensKat wrote:Yeah, dab Refs suck if you've got it! (I don't)
Yeah, dab Refs suck if you've got it! (I don't)
agreed, and I don't have it either
Dab, and undab coach's challenge.
Russell wrote:Refs suck?
Refs suck?
If I gave a sh*t at all about this season I’d be a tad upset 😡
senior wrote:Would the Logan Brown goal be considered a Sens goal back? Ref did say no goal due to goalie interference.
Would the Logan Brown goal be considered a Sens goal back? Ref did say no goal due to goalie interference.
yup, that's a goal called back dab
yep
