don't suppose anyone lost a lid in this game?

https://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=GQZsSOeirAIpRthlnXNEYJom&scored=7197728&tscored=111112200102112&bname=Russell?

my card.

Cathy wrote:

---

For crying out loud, just end it!

---

 twss

tjlincoln wrote:

---

Quacks 3-2 Terry winner

---

 Wrong 😑 

No cigar today: https://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=WNfXnOdACBYRFhLGakpIZMjS&scored=13245016&tscored=221001020122102&bname=senior

One cigar on my card.  If we count the 2-on-1 break, it's two cigars. 

my final too many almost-bingos card

senior wrote:

---

Never any doubt.

---

 Well maybe some...

I hate hockey

I hate bingo

final OTT card

final ANA card

Never any doubt.

Silfverberg getting sassy?! 

Cathy wrote:

---

The digital ads are a real mind-f*ck when you watch the opposition feed of an arena you know very well.

---

 lol, Why is Bell and Canadian Tire advertising in Anaheim. 

Homer wrote:

---

Ducks should pull the goalie and Sens score a SH here, just saying...

---

 That would be an EN as well? I'm in!

The digital ads are a real mind-f*ck when you watch the opposition feed of an arena you know very well.

Ducks should pull the goalie and Sens score a SH here, just saying...

For crying out loud, just end it!

refs suck

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Pfft, *I* think they should challenge

But, honestly, what's the point at 5-1 vs 5-0?

---

 The point is that it's worth a dab. 

Play is under review. 

---

the goal stands. 

Cathy wrote:

---

I've already dabbed the disallowed square 

---

 Really? 

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Pfft, *I* think they should challenge

But, honestly, what's the point at 5-1 vs 5-0?

---

 The point is that it's worth a dab. 

Play is under review. 

---

I've already dabbed the disallowed square