Okay. ***THAT'S*** a dumb penalty.

Holy shot count differential, Batman.

tjlincoln wrote:

---

tjlincoln wrote:

---

Sheesh, how many PP’s they going to give TB

---

 I’m not talking the refs, they are killing themselves 

---

 I wouldn't turn down an official Ref Sucks though. Just sayin'

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

So play under review for a penalty here....

---

 and verdict is match penalty. 

Counts as a review dab if you have it. 

---

 That's the first dab I *don't* have, I feel like my card and Sens are possibly going off the rails together. 

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

So play under review for a penalty here....

---

 and verdict is match penalty. 

Counts as a review dab if you have it. 

---

 Should we give that one a Dumb Penalty?

SensKat wrote:

---

So play under review for a penalty here....

---

 and verdict is match penalty. 

Counts as a review dab if you have it. 

tjlincoln wrote:

---

Sheesh, how many PP’s they going to give TB

---

 I should keep the Speed "what you needed another challenge" gif in my permanent collection.

tjlincoln wrote:

---

Sheesh, how many PP’s they going to give TB

---

 I’m not talking the refs, they are killing themselves 

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Screened one-timer?

 

(I have limited rewind capabilities)

---

 Checked and yeah, Forsberg saw nothing. 

---

 Commentary said something about Perry being in the way and I was like, "Yeah, that's definitely on brand for him."

Cathy wrote:

---

Screened one-timer?

 

(I have limited rewind capabilities)

---

 Checked and yeah, Forsberg saw nothing. 

Oh god that's right…it's Movember.

Screened one-timer?

(I have limited rewind capabilities)

One timer for the bolts.

Homer wrote:

---

Kat, want to go halfsies on the the Sens?

---

 hmmmm.... I've got a few buck stashed away.