Russell wrote:

---

there's the nightly horrific giveaway by 18. 

---

 That could have been a "Ups, mein Fehler" if they had scored. 

there's the nightly horrific giveaway by 18. 

2 on 1

Cat is so snake bit this year. 

It's always nice when the commentary is literally the phrasing of the square

Sens 2nd post

Russell wrote:

---

that looked like a .....respectful hit by Chuckie on EK65. 

---

 yeah, he could have plastered him, but contained it by putting his arms up and absorbed the hit a bit.  A good hockey hit. 

holy crap that kick pass by chuckie. lmao. 

that looked like a .....respectful hit by Chuckie on EK65. 

Cathy wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

has hertl ever not lit us up?

and that was just awful playing in the neutral zone by motte and gambrell on that goal. 

---

 9G + 1A in 15 games against OTT

---

 seems like much more. 

Russell wrote:

---

has hertl ever not lit us up?

and that was just awful playing in the neutral zone by motte and gambrell on that goal. 

---

 9G + 1A in 15 games against OTT

Russell wrote:

---

has hertl ever not lit us up?

and that was just awful playing in the neutral zone by motte and gambrell on that goal. 

---

 Does he think he's Peter Bondra or something?

has hertl ever not lit us up?

and that was just awful playing in the neutral zone by motte and gambrell on that goal. 

Cathy wrote:

---

2 in 36 seconds

---

 someone got a point against his former team. 

2 in 36 seconds

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

That had to be a deviation, right? lol

---

 I think he got the rebound?

---

 I think you might be right, but they showed more angles of the celly than the goal.

It just looked like a pinball machine in there.

Cathy wrote:

---

That had to be a deviation, right? lol

---

 I think he got the rebound?

Its Brady's world, and we're all just getting punched in the face in it.