When you get nothing on a multi-dab play, it's quite discouraging for the evening's prospects.
Still waiting for the SH, Deviated, EN, Off the post goal, in final minute of a period, by a D-man, gets reviewed and counts scenario.
Oh and also a 3rd point for someone on that goal.
That was both Amazing, and someone trips and hilariously ends up in the net
Homer said
Jun 7, 2021
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
When you get nothing on a multi-dab play, it's quite discouraging for the evening's prospects.
Still waiting for the SH, Deviated, EN, Off the post goal, in final minute of a period, by a D-man, gets reviewed and counts scenario.
Oh and also a 3rd point for someone on that goal.
Homer said
Jun 7, 2021
Cathy wrote:
When you get nothing on a multi-dab play, it's quite discouraging for the evening's prospects.
Still waiting for the SH, Deviated, EN, Off the post goal, in final minute of a period, by a D-man, gets reviewed and counts scenario.
Cathy said
Jun 7, 2021
SensKat wrote:
Cathy wrote:
SensKat wrote:
sounded like a post and in?
NHLN commentary said yes.
(triggered SensKat patience delay)
haha. Annoying, isn't it?
Yes, it is. I usually just wait but I figured, why not provide commentary?
Cathy said
Jun 7, 2021
Lol, it took NHLN a good 15 seconds to get the PP up on the board. I was like, wait, I saw a guy in the box, I know I did.
Cathy said
Jun 7, 2021
SensKat wrote:
Defenseman goal
So that's a 4-dab goal and I have n-o-t-h-i-n-g!
Cathy said
Jun 7, 2021
The forum software just can't handle the speed at which Cat/Kat brains operate. Sad.
SensKat said
Jun 7, 2021
Cathy wrote:
SensKat wrote:
sounded like a post and in?
NHLN commentary said yes.
(triggered SensKat patience delay)
haha. Annoying, isn't it?
SensKat said
Jun 7, 2021
Defenseman goal
Cathy said
Jun 7, 2021
SensKat wrote:
sounded like a post and in?
NHLN commentary said yes.
(triggered SensKat patience delay)
Cathy said
Jun 7, 2021
When you get nothing on a multi-dab play, it's quite discouraging for the evening's prospects.
SensKat said
Jun 7, 2021
sounded like a post and in?
Homer said
Jun 7, 2021
Cathy wrote:
Homer wrote:
Does a goalie negating an icing because player was going to beat the icing count as beat the icing?
I stepped away for a sec...skater was on track to beat the icing already so goalie said, "What the hell, might as well play the puck?" I think in that case, yes.
I first read your post as goalie played puck without pressure and negated the icing. Which I don't think would be the spirit of the square but could definitely be a brain fart if we still had it.
It was the former. FTR, I don't have that square. Saw the play develop and it sparked a thought... then there was smoke.
Cathy said
Jun 7, 2021
Cathy wrote:
Home team get first PP
And score, post and in
SensKat said
Jun 7, 2021
home team scores 1st, on the PP
SensKat said
Jun 7, 2021
Home team first PP
-- Edited by SensKat on Monday 7th of June 2021 08:23:55 PM
Cathy said
Jun 7, 2021
Home team get first PP
Cathy said
Jun 7, 2021
SensKat wrote:
Homer wrote:
Does a goalie negating an icing because player was going to beat the icing count as beat the icing?
geez..... I would have to rule no, I guess....
Kat and Cat on opposite sides, the world just might be ending.
(There's been a cluster of earthquakes at the CA/Mexico boarder so, yeah, maybe!)
Cathy said
Jun 7, 2021
Homer wrote:
Does a goalie negating an icing because player was going to beat the icing count as beat the icing?
I stepped away for a sec...skater was on track to beat the icing already so goalie said, "What the hell, might as well play the puck?" I think in that case, yes.
I first read your post as goalie played puck without pressure and negated the icing. Which I don't think would be the spirit of the square but could definitely be a brain fart if we still had it.
SensKat said
Jun 7, 2021
Homer wrote:
Does a goalie negating an icing because player was going to beat the icing count as beat the icing?
That was both Amazing, and someone trips and hilariously ends up in the net
Oh and also a 3rd point for someone on that goal.
Still waiting for the SH, Deviated, EN, Off the post goal, in final minute of a period, by a D-man, gets reviewed and counts scenario.
Yes, it is. I usually just wait but I figured, why not provide commentary?
Lol, it took NHLN a good 15 seconds to get the PP up on the board. I was like, wait, I saw a guy in the box, I know I did.
So that's a 4-dab goal and I have n-o-t-h-i-n-g!
The forum software just can't handle the speed at which Cat/Kat brains operate. Sad.
haha. Annoying, isn't it?
NHLN commentary said yes.
(triggered SensKat patience delay)
When you get nothing on a multi-dab play, it's quite discouraging for the evening's prospects.
It was the former. FTR, I don't have that square. Saw the play develop and it sparked a thought... then there was smoke.
And score, post and in
Home team first PP
-- Edited by SensKat on Monday 7th of June 2021 08:23:55 PM
Home team get first PP
Kat and Cat on opposite sides, the world just might be ending.
(There's been a cluster of earthquakes at the CA/Mexico boarder so, yeah, maybe!)
I stepped away for a sec...skater was on track to beat the icing already so goalie said, "What the hell, might as well play the puck?" I think in that case, yes.
I first read your post as goalie played puck without pressure and negated the icing. Which I don't think would be the spirit of the square but could definitely be a brain fart if we still had it.
geez..... I would have to rule no, I guess....