SensKat wrote:

---

G spot!

---

 If the Sens can score 1st I'm on track for a bingo.

Russell wrote:

---

how come their goalie doesn't suffer double catastrophic knee injuries?

---

 It's not a Sens thing.

how come their goalie doesn't suffer double catastrophic knee injuries?

Homer wrote:

---

Wait, so Merilainen played his 1st AHL game on Saturday and tonight, his 1st NHL game?

---

 next week he's being inducted into the hall of fame. he's fast tracking. 

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

ok, have you guys ever wondered what it would look like if penalties worked differently... and instead of the penalized team losing a player, the other team got to ADD a player? So you would play 6 on 5, 7 on 5, etc....

---

 so when a penally ends, it could 6-on-6, or 7-on-7?  That's a lot of SNES.

---

 Actually, on second thought, too many SNES is too many potential injuries at the same time. Ix-nay on the fun experiment.

---

  Bring back the bike interviews!

SensKat wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

ok, have you guys ever wondered what it would look like if penalties worked differently... and instead of the penalized team losing a player, the other team got to ADD a player? So you would play 6 on 5, 7 on 5, etc....

---

 how about this;

have you guys ever wondered what the sens would be like if they didn't have frequent flyer points at the hospital?

---

 Bring back the bike interviews!

---

you know, they were a much better team when they did those. 

Wait, so Merilainen played his 1st AHL game on Saturday and tonight, his 1st NHL game?

Russell wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

ok, have you guys ever wondered what it would look like if penalties worked differently... and instead of the penalized team losing a player, the other team got to ADD a player? So you would play 6 on 5, 7 on 5, etc....

---

 how about this;

have you guys ever wondered what the sens would be like if they didn't have frequent flyer points at the hospital?

---

 Bring back the bike interviews!

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

ok, have you guys ever wondered what it would look like if penalties worked differently... and instead of the penalized team losing a player, the other team got to ADD a player? So you would play 6 on 5, 7 on 5, etc....

---

 so when a penally ends, it could 6-on-6, or 7-on-7?  That's a lot of SNES.

---

 Actually, on second thought, too many SNES is too many potential injuries at the same time. Ix-nay on the fun experiment.

SensKat wrote:

---

ok, have you guys ever wondered what it would look like if penalties worked differently... and instead of the penalized team losing a player, the other team got to ADD a player? So you would play 6 on 5, 7 on 5, etc....

---

 so when a penally ends, it could 6-on-6, or 7-on-7?  That's a lot of SNES.

Russell wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

ok, have you guys ever wondered what it would look like if penalties worked differently... and instead of the penalized team losing a player, the other team got to ADD a player? So you would play 6 on 5, 7 on 5, etc....

---

 ice is crowded enough as it is. 

---

 Yeah, even 6-on-5 with a pulled goalie can get cluttered.

It'd be an entertaining experiment though!

Cathy wrote:

---

"Giroux and his bouncers, I tell ya…"

---

 twss

SensKat wrote:

---

ok, have you guys ever wondered what it would look like if penalties worked differently... and instead of the penalized team losing a player, the other team got to ADD a player? So you would play 6 on 5, 7 on 5, etc....

---

 how about this;

have you guys ever wondered what the sens would be like if they didn't have frequent flyer points at the hospital?

"Giroux and his bouncers, I tell ya…"

SensKat wrote:

---

ok, have you guys ever wondered what it would look like if penalties worked differently... and instead of the penalized team losing a player, the other team got to ADD a player? So you would play 6 on 5, 7 on 5, etc....

---

 ice is crowded enough as it is. 

PA announcer caught napping.  Calls the final minute of the 1st with 50 secs left. 

OOOWW!!!! HAMBURGERS!