Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Tkachuk 3-point game

Sure, technically it's 2/3 and 1/3.

---

It's official now.

---

 Maybe not, Sens are challenging for an offside. 

Cathy wrote:

---

Tkachuk 3-point game

Sure, technically it's 2/3 and 1/3.

---

It's official now.

Ouch. Saw that one a split second before it happened.

3-point night, for reals

it had to happen. that was hegemony. 

Russell wrote:

---

60+ shots against is nto good, right?

---

 The spouse isn't even that bad.

ok, I need more from Strudel. He's not being a game changer like he's supposed to be. 

60+ shots against is nto good, right?

Cathy wrote:

---

Is that's roughing then the previous Kastelic "roughings" were MMA fights.

---

 Sens reaction

Is that's roughing then the previous Kastelic "roughings" were MMA fights.

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

did they say the FLA goal was post and in? i think i heard them say that. 

---

 Just checked the replay and it was. 

---

 Does that count as 2nd post also or no?

---

 No

Homer wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

did they say the FLA goal was post and in? i think i heard them say that. 

---

 Just checked the replay and it was. 

---

 Does that count as 2nd post also or no?

Okay, THAT'S overlapping.

Russell wrote:

---

did they say the FLA goal was post and in? i think i heard them say that. 

---

 Just checked the replay and it was. 

Tkachuk 3-point game

Sure, technically it's 2/3 and 1/3.

Russell wrote:

---

did they say the FLA goal was post and in? i think i heard them say that. 

---

 nothing on the PxP

SensKat wrote:

---

that one has to be a fight, right?

---

 Nope, roughing again

ok, I'll vacuum for her during the int. Now we're eve. 

did they say the FLA goal was post and in? i think i heard them say that. 

tjlincoln wrote:

---

shoulda challenged?

---

 don;'t think so. It looked good. 

I'm heading out, so leaving my current card here for later check.