2nd Period stats

Chabot 8:16 ice time

shots 15-10 leafs.

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

Coaches challenge.

He'll win, that was offside.

---

 Coach's challenge square is gone, it's only "Play under review (goal/penalty)" to reduce redundancy and make it more simple.

Counts for Coach's challenge, automatic review by refs or one initiated by league war room. 

---

I suppose you could rename it to, "Officials pull out iPads" to simplify it further.  

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

Coaches challenge.

He'll win, that was offside.

---

 Coach's challenge square is gone, it's only "Play under review (goal/penalty)" to reduce redundancy and make it more simple.

Counts for Coach's challenge, automatic review by refs or one initiated by league war room. 

---

 lol.... yep, but the actual event in the game was a Coaches Challenge.....

SensKat wrote:

---

Coaches challenge.

He'll win, that was offside.

---

 Coach's challenge square is gone, it's only "Play under review (goal/penalty)" to reduce redundancy and make it more simple.

Counts for Coach's challenge, automatic review by refs or one initiated by league war room. 

Russell wrote:

---

I guess that’s payback for the kicked in goal from game 1 we got away with. 

---

Oh, well, if we're gonna bring karma into it then...{grumble}...fine. 

Homer wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

Tie Game..... I have no idea what just happened

---

Play under review (goal/penalty) dab

Sure looks offside by an inch.

---

 "Goal disallowed / waved off"

Of course I have those two squares. 

---

 woohoo, I dabbed something!

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

Tie Game..... I have no idea what just happened

---

Play under review (goal/penalty) dab

Sure looks offside by an inch.

---

 "Goal disallowed / waved off"

Of course I have those two squares. 

I guess that’s payback for the kicked in goal from game 1 we got away with. 

SensKat wrote:

---

Tie Game..... I have no idea what just happened

---

Play under review (goal/penalty) dab

Sure looks offside by an inch.

Oh FFS! That is NOT the intention of the offside review rule in any way, shape, or form.

What a shame. Such an amazing effort. 

AYFKM!!

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

"That's the end of a minute shift for Stutzle..."

Please, he's a teenager, he can handle it.

---

 Tw the cougar s.

---

Believe me, I edited the comment several times to avoid leaving the door COMPLETELY wide open.

---

 I saw the door open a crack, but let Russell open it. 

---

Coward.  

Cathy wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

"That's the end of a minute shift for Stutzle..."

Please, he's a teenager, he can handle it.

---

 Tw the cougar s.

---

Believe me, I edited the comment several times to avoid leaving the door COMPLETELY wide open.

---

 I saw the door open a crack, but let Russell open it. 

SensKat wrote:

---

Norris gets them on the board

---

 on the PP, with a slick delay move. 

Cathy wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

"That's the end of a minute shift for Stutzle..."

Please, he's a teenager, he can handle it.

---

 Tw the cougar s.

---

Believe me, I edited the comment several times to avoid leaving the door COMPLETELY wide open.

---

 Well, you failed miserably. 

I hope the company with the blue/black logo in the pizza slice didn't pay a lot of money for that exposure.