SensKat wrote:

---

visiting team outshoots in the 1st. Game tied after 1.

---

 I don't have those.

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

penalty overlap.   I should just rename the square to that. 

Also dump penalty?

---

 I have dumb penalty, can I dab that instead?

---

 I meant renaming "Penalty called while one being served" to Penalty Overlap, which it was. 

Dumb penalty because it was offside play and late hit after whistle. 

---

 re-read your post more carefully :)

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

penalty overlap.   I should just rename the square to that. 

Also dump penalty?

---

 I have dumb penalty, can I dab that instead?

---

 I meant renaming "Penalty called while one being served" to Penalty Overlap, which it was. 

Dumb penalty because it was offside play and late hit after whistle. 

---

 Whoosh!

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

I think I sunburned my scalp today

---

 Ouch

---

 Unofficial start of summer.

SensKat wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

penalty overlap.   I should just rename the square to that. 

Also dump penalty?

---

 I have dumb penalty, can I dab that instead?

---

 I meant renaming "Penalty called while one being served" to Penalty Overlap, which it was. 

Dumb penalty because it was offside play and late hit after whistle. 

So, Canada, you guys planning on winning *a* game in Latvia?

SensKat wrote:

---

I think I sunburned my scalp today

---

 Ouch

Homer wrote:

---

penalty overlap.   I should just rename the square to that. 

Also dump penalty?

---

 I have dumb penalty, can I dab that instead?

penalty overlap.   I should just rename the square to that. 

Also dump penalty?

SensKat wrote:

---

nope, he got it:

twitter.com/NHLGIFs/status/1396973092577193986

---

 The dab was nice while it lasted.

Cathy wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

---

 Shoulda had that, amazing *move* but nothing to save since Spezza shot it high

---

 You think so?

---

 The replay looked like it went right over the net, not deflected by Price.

---

SHOT TOR ONGOAL - #19 SPEZZA, Wrist, Off. Zone, 9 ft.

STOP PUCK IN NETTING

MTL won Def. Zone - TOR #15 KERFOOT vs MTL #14 SUZUKI

If it was straight over and in netting, faceoff would have been in neutral zone?

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

---

 Shoulda had that, amazing *move* but nothing to save since Spezza shot it high

---

 Faceoff was in the Montreal end, so Price would have gotten at least a piece of it?

---

 Well, I switched to a non-pixelated, but also non-rewindable feed so I've used up all my available views. lol

SensKat wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

---

 Shoulda had that, amazing *move* but nothing to save since Spezza shot it high

---

 You think so?

---

 The replay looked like it went right over the net, not deflected by Price.

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

---

 Shoulda had that, amazing *move* but nothing to save since Spezza shot it high

---

 Faceoff was in the Montreal end, so Price would have gotten at least a piece of it?

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

---

 Shoulda had that, amazing *move* but nothing to save since Spezza shot it high

---

 You think so?

Homer wrote:

---

I think that qualifies for an Amazing Save.  or a Shoulda had that.

---

 let's go with Amazing Save.  We haven't dabbed that one yet.