I know we've gone around on it, but maybe we should put Fight back in
Cathy said
May 16, 2021
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Double minor square?
I was thinking about that one.
Unlikely to be anything other than high-sticking but we are heavy on the scoring squares so another PIM-based square can't hurt.
Homer said
May 16, 2021
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Double minor square?
I was thinking about that one.
Would be when it results in 4 min PP and not one player gets 4 and player on other team gets 2?
Cathy said
May 16, 2021
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
Eyeballing the 2020 playoffs, win by 3+ happened about as often as OT. Kat brings up a good point about back-loading the cards.
What about {team} leads after 1st? (I'm trying to think of ways to force early dabs)
so "Home team leads after 1" or "Game tied after 1" or both instead of "one goal win"
Both games this morning/afternoon would be tied after 1.
I'm not in love with it, but it does force the dab/no dab early. Tied after 1 in this game is a double dab with goal-free too.
Homer said
May 16, 2021
Cathy wrote:
Double minor square?
I was thinking about that one.
Homer said
May 16, 2021
Cathy wrote:
Eyeballing the 2020 playoffs, win by 3+ happened about as often as OT. Kat brings up a good point about back-loading the cards.
What about {team} leads after 1st? (I'm trying to think of ways to force early dabs)
so "Home team leads after 1" or "Game tied after 1" or both instead of "one goal win"
Both games this morning/afternoon would be tied after 1.
Cathy said
May 16, 2021
Double minor square?
Cathy said
May 16, 2021
Homer wrote:
SensKat wrote:
Homer wrote:
So far I'm batting .500 on Bingos.
Might need a few more tweaks. We can't make it too easy.
Change "one goal game" to either "win by 2 goals" or "win by 3+" goals since one goal game becomes a double dab with OT.
I think 1st round last year was 55% one goal games. 2 goal wins=9 and 3+ goal wins=10
Was thinking of adding "beat the icing" square"
Hmmm. I also don't want to back-load the cards too much where we are waiting for all the dabs to happen at the end of the game.
Do we have a "well THAT was dumb" square? :)
Might need to make a 1 or two squares "Home Team" instead of both. Losing the Sens Player specific squares to make it more generic adds a lot of dabs. Cathy and I are batting .500.
4 corner bingo is also in play too, so an extra way to get a bingo.
Might need a few more tweaks. We can't make it too easy.
Change "one goal game" to either "win by 2 goals" or "win by 3+" goals since one goal game becomes a double dab with OT.
I think 1st round last year was 55% one goal games. 2 goal wins=9 and 3+ goal wins=10
Was thinking of adding "beat the icing" square"
Hmmm. I also don't want to back-load the cards too much where we are waiting for all the dabs to happen at the end of the game.
Do we have a "well THAT was dumb" square? :)
Might need to make a 1 or two squares "Home Team" instead of both. Losing the Sens Player specific squares to make it more generic adds a lot of dabs. Cathy and I are batting .500.
4 corner bingo is also in play too, so an extra way to get a bingo.
SensKat said
May 16, 2021
and goal-free period
SensKat said
May 16, 2021
Home team outshoots in the 1st
SensKat said
May 16, 2021
Homer wrote:
So far I'm batting .500 on Bingos.
Might need a few more tweaks. We can't make it too easy.
Change "one goal game" to either "win by 2 goals" or "win by 3+" goals since one goal game becomes a double dab with OT.
I think 1st round last year was 55% one goal games. 2 goal wins=9 and 3+ goal wins=10
Was thinking of adding "beat the icing" square"
Hmmm. I also don't want to back-load the cards too much where we are waiting for all the dabs to happen at the end of the game.
Do we have a "well THAT was dumb" square? :)
Cathy said
May 16, 2021
Homer wrote:
Cathy wrote:
SensKat wrote:
Stone and Lehner are the only former Sens in this series, right?
LOL, I'm totally relying on you guys for that square.
I think those are the only ones. No Wild ex-Sens.
Only passive ex-Sens? The puns are going to abound in this series.
Cathy said
May 16, 2021
Homer wrote:
So far I'm batting .500 on Bingos.
Might need a few more tweaks. We can't make it too easy.
Change "one goal game" to either "win by 2 goals" or "win by 3+" goals since one goal game becomes a double dab with OT.
I think 1st round last year was 55% one goal games. 2 goal wins=9 and 3+ goal wins=10
Was thinking of adding "beat the icing" square"
We need this game to end in regulation for a good test. I was 10 and 7 dabs going into OT, then bingo'd on both cards with OT. (And I didn't bingo yesterday)
Homer said
May 16, 2021
Cathy wrote:
SensKat wrote:
Stone and Lehner are the only former Sens in this series, right?
LOL, I'm totally relying on you guys for that square.
I think those are the only ones. No Wild ex-Sens.
Homer said
May 16, 2021
So far I'm batting .500 on Bingos.
Might need a few more tweaks. We can't make it too easy.
Change "one goal game" to either "win by 2 goals" or "win by 3+" goals since one goal game becomes a double dab with OT.
I think 1st round last year was 55% one goal games. 2 goal wins=9 and 3+ goal wins=10
Was thinking of adding "beat the icing" square"
Cathy said
May 16, 2021
SensKat wrote:
Stone and Lehner are the only former Sens in this series, right?
LOL, I'm totally relying on you guys for that square.
Unlikely to be anything other than high-sticking but we are heavy on the scoring squares so another PIM-based square can't hurt.
Would be when it results in 4 min PP and not one player gets 4 and player on other team gets 2?
I'm not in love with it, but it does force the dab/no dab early. Tied after 1 in this game is a double dab with goal-free too.
I was thinking about that one.
so "Home team leads after 1" or "Game tied after 1" or both instead of "one goal win"
Both games this morning/afternoon would be tied after 1.
Double minor square?
I'm at .667, only played one card yesterday.
LOL, *now* I understand why you posted your cards when you relocated before.
Eyeballing the 2020 playoffs, win by 3+ happened about as often as OT. Kat brings up a good point about back-loading the cards.
What about {team} leads after 1st? (I'm trying to think of ways to force early dabs)
switching back to living room
Card #1
Card #2
Might need to make a 1 or two squares "Home Team" instead of both. Losing the Sens Player specific squares to make it more generic adds a lot of dabs. Cathy and I are batting .500.
4 corner bingo is also in play too, so an extra way to get a bingo.
Hmmm. I also don't want to back-load the cards too much where we are waiting for all the dabs to happen at the end of the game.
Do we have a "well THAT was dumb" square? :)
Only passive ex-Sens? The puns are going to abound in this series.
We need this game to end in regulation for a good test. I was 10 and 7 dabs going into OT, then bingo'd on both cards with OT. (And I didn't bingo yesterday)
I think those are the only ones. No Wild ex-Sens.
So far I'm batting .500 on Bingos.
Might need a few more tweaks. We can't make it too easy.
Change "one goal game" to either "win by 2 goals" or "win by 3+" goals since one goal game becomes a double dab with OT.
I think 1st round last year was 55% one goal games. 2 goal wins=9 and 3+ goal wins=10
Was thinking of adding "beat the icing" square"
LOL, I'm totally relying on you guys for that square.