I can bingo bed with a timeout

Oh, was that 2 in 90?

2 in 90.

Russell wrote:

---

Would we call that a 2 on 1? It only lasted half a second. 

---

 I don't think we're that desperate for dabs (yet)

Well, that one was. 2 on 1. 

Geezus

Why couldn't they have been this good literally ANY OTHER ****ING YEAR?

Would we call that a 2 on 1? It only lasted half a second. 

Russell wrote:

---

Breakaway, other team post. 

---

 Too much is happening for my level of awakedness 

Breakaway, other team post. 

Hands of condra for cozens. Wide freaking open. 

Cathy wrote:

---

Sens post

 

---

 2 posts in 90 seconds

Sens post.

make that 2. 

Sens post

No more moorings under net

Dumb/ cousins penalty.

Timmy earning that A+ from Noodles

Russell wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

If the Sens come home from this trip with .500, with no Chuckie or chabot, that would be a very successful trip. IMO. 

---

 I mean, no Chuckie or chabot playing, not like they leave them out west. 

---

Russell wrote:

---

If the Sens come home from this trip with .500, with no Chuckie or chabot, that would be a very successful trip. IMO. 

---

 I mean, no Chuckie or chabot playing, not like they leave them out west. 

If the Sens come home from this trip with .500, with no Chuckie or chabot, that would be a very successful trip. IMO. 

Russell wrote:

---

Sens score first, one hammer, screen goal.

---

 Quad dab and I only recognized one…I am definitely off my game tonight.