This is the Penguins do you think they get the benefit of the doubt here?
I think it was iffy, Stutzle's skate being behind the goalie's skate is..in my mind…legit interference when they touch.
To me, it was definitely a 50-50 call of course the senators hit the post and don’t make it 2
Cathy said
Jan 11, 2025
And I was checking the Kleven goal for additional dabs on NHL site and the Pinto goal data just appeared, I legit did a "What the…?" since the feed was a couple seconds behind.
DAB— Pinto beans on PP, one-timer
DAB— Sens post
Okay, since it's just me logging for bingo I'll go with the usual easy-to-read format...
-- Edited by Cathy on Saturday 11th of January 2025 04:20:05 PM
Cathy said
Jan 11, 2025
tjlincoln wrote:
This is the Penguins do you think they get the benefit of the doubt here?
I think it was iffy, Stutzle's skate being behind the goalie's skate is..in my mind…legit interference when they touch.
tjlincoln said
Jan 11, 2025
tjlincoln wrote:
This is the Penguins do you think they get the benefit of the doubt here?
Ha ha NOOOOOOOO
Cathy said
Jan 11, 2025
DAB—good goal, Sens 1st PP
tjlincoln said
Jan 11, 2025
This is the Penguins do you think they get the benefit of the doubt here?
Cathy said
Jan 11, 2025
What's the kinda-sorta-maybe-new guy rule, <10 games last season? If so, Kleven with (maybe) new guy point.
Cathy said
Jan 11, 2025
Cathy wrote:
Sens score 1st on, all together everybody, the first shot of the game (you had to be there)
DAB— Check that, play under review
Cathy said
Jan 11, 2025
DAB—Sens score 1st on, all together everybody, the first shot of the game (you had to be there)
Cathy said
Jan 11, 2025
puckity droppity
or paucity droopily as autocorrect would prefer
Cathy said
Jan 11, 2025
tjlincoln wrote:
6-1 Pittsburgh Penguins and the game-winning goal by Malkin
I like the afternoon games but I won't stick around for that.
Cathy said
Jan 11, 2025
4-2 PIT, Rackell GWG
Also, holy ****, Rackell is the leading scoring on the Pens? Why did we trade him away? Oh yeah... "in exchange for a 2022 second-round pick, Dominik Simon, Zach Aston-Reese, and Calle Clang." 🙄
To me, it was definitely a 50-50 call of course the senators hit the post and don’t make it 2
And
DAB— Pinto beans on PP, one-timer
DAB— Sens post
Okay, since it's just me logging for bingo I'll go with the usual easy-to-read format...
-- Edited by Cathy on Saturday 11th of January 2025 04:20:05 PM
I think it was iffy, Stutzle's skate being behind the goalie's skate is..in my mind…legit interference when they touch.
Ha ha NOOOOOOOO
DAB—good goal, Sens 1st PP
What's the kinda-sorta-maybe-new guy rule, <10 games last season? If so, Kleven with (maybe) new guy point.
DAB— Check that, play under review
DAB—Sens score 1st on, all together everybody, the first shot of the game (you had to be there)
puckity droppity
or paucity droopily as autocorrect would prefer
I like the afternoon games but I won't stick around for that.
4-2 PIT, Rackell GWG
Also, holy ****, Rackell is the leading scoring on the Pens? Why did we trade him away? Oh yeah... "in exchange for a 2022 second-round pick, Dominik Simon, Zach Aston-Reese, and Calle Clang." 🙄
my card
Come on!!!! You can’t keep predicting this 🤣🤣
5-2 bad guys. Crosby GWG.
My card: https://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=QJncjfRkMUpVoDBKgLhrIGET&scored=4096&bname=senior
https://www.focusring.ca/bingo/SensBingo.html?board=oKJpQmVMrNcYalEWbZesCGBu&scored=4096&bname=Russell#
Card
Afternoon game, mid season game.
4-2 Sens, tj might hate this, but... Stutzle with the winner. lol
Get your Sens Bingo card here
My card