That was a rather meh period.

tjlincoln wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Not sure I'd call that "lowering the boom" but, whatever...

---

 Saw someone say this on Twitter too 🤣🤣

---

 that awkward moment when what looked significant in real time looks quite pathetic in slo-mo

Cathy wrote:

---

Not sure I'd call that "lowering the boom" but, whatever...

---

 Saw someone say this on Twitter too 🤣🤣

SensKat wrote:

---

Roslovic, Werenski, and Laine all on 3 point watch

---

 Grr

SensKat wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

I feel like they updated the twitter feeds again. I hate twitter some days.

---

 I hate it when you see a commented re-tweet, click on the original tweet to get more context, then go back to the RT you saw to either RT that or reply to it, but your timeline refreshes and no matter how much you scroll up and down, you can't find it. 

---

 I hate when it resets from "latest tweets" to whatever f-ed up algorithm they use for the default feed.  NOBODY wants it that way.  You miss so much stuff.  

---

 yeah, that too.  Show me the newest.  

Turning Red in two tweets.  lol

root chakra destroyer @pokembersegg
PSA:
I watched Turning Red with my boys this weekend. Boys aged 9 and 13. They had lots of questions regarding girls and their periods. I wish there had been a warning before watching it with them. Now they're dead.

Grace Smith @Gracectomy
Great, I took my two young children to Turning Red and now have to explain to them what Toronto is

Homer wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

I feel like they updated the twitter feeds again. I hate twitter some days.

---

 I hate it when you see a commented re-tweet, click on the original tweet to get more context, then go back to the RT you saw to either RT that or reply to it, but your timeline refreshes and no matter how much you scroll up and down, you can't find it. 

---

 I hate when it resets from "latest tweets" to whatever f-ed up algorithm they use for the default feed.  NOBODY wants it that way.  You miss so much stuff.  

Cathy wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

for anyone that hasn't seen this.... the replies on this twitter thread are awesome:

twitter.com/MailOnline/status/1503400626008596487

---

 {reads original tweet}

 

I can guess where this goes...

---

 Asteroid the size of 500 pints of ice-cream hits Earth off the coast of Iceland

scheisse

SensKat wrote:

---

I feel like they updated the twitter feeds again. I hate twitter some days.

---

 I hate it when you see a commented re-tweet, click on the original tweet to get more context, then go back to the RT you saw to either RT that or reply to it, but your timeline refreshes and no matter how much you scroll up and down, you can't find it. 

SensKat wrote:

---

for anyone that hasn't seen this.... the replies on this twitter thread are awesome:

twitter.com/MailOnline/status/1503400626008596487

---

 {reads original tweet}

I can guess where this goes...

SensKat wrote:

---

Guess he's ok

---

 and back to the dressing room.

feck

Oh dear...

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Does that count as 2-on-1 or too weak?

---

 Was thinking yes since it led to an actual goal.  Also a weak post and in, but that might be pushing it.

---

 I mean, I think overskating the defender is actually more insulting that getting the break at center ice.

I didn't watch the replay, did it kiss the post on the way by? Post is post, that's pretty binary in my book.

-- Edited by Cathy on Wednesday 16th of March 2022 08:15:16 PM

---

 overhead showed an along the ice, just got piece of the post as it went in. Puck might have been across the line when it clipped the inside of the post. 

---

Yeah, I just rewound it, it was already going in. Depends on the technical definition of "post and in".