Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

Parker Kelly on that play

 

-- Edited by Homer on Tuesday 2nd of April 2024 10:13:09 PM

---

 lol, never seen that before

---

 Twss

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

LUBE!!

---

 A big 'ol dollop!

---

 Wild fans have a different opinion.

Goal waived off?

Homer wrote:

---

LUBE!!

---

 A big 'ol dollop!

LUBE!!

Return of London Bobby

Homer wrote:

---

Parker Kelly on that play

 

-- Edited by Homer on Tuesday 2nd of April 2024 10:13:09 PM

---

 lol, never seen that before

Breakaway.

Parker Kelly on that play

Remember Agent Orange? I wonder what ever happened to him?

We haven’t seen Shanghai in awhile. 

Cathy wrote:

---

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Dman PP goal

Enough for one timer?

---

 I say yes.  Wasn't a wind up slapper, but he did go down on a knee. 

---

 Haha, the knee was the same criteria I was using.

---

 Twss

Homer wrote:

---

Russell wrote:

---

I’ve decided that to help pay for the cat's dental tomorrow, I’m going to sell bibles. It will be a special Sens call ups edition that will come with bingo cards, and have one section devoted to the Gerber/emery debate. 

---

 So you're gonna use my bingo cards and not give me any royalties?  How very Trump of you.

---

 This is a witch hunt!

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Dman PP goal

Enough for one timer?

---

 I say yes.  Wasn't a wind up slapper, but he did go down on a knee. 

---

 Haha, the knee was the same criteria I was using.

Russell wrote:

---

Damn! Batherson is ridiculous right now.  

---

 Mentoring from Alfie?

Cathy wrote:

---

Dman PP goal

Enough for one timer?

---

 I say yes.  Wasn't a wind up slapper, but he did go down on a knee. 

Damn! Batherson is ridiculous right now.  

Dman PP goal

Enough for one timer?

Sens dman scores on a one-timer.

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

Wait, what… the whole pulling the goalie in OT means different point distribution?

---

Rule 84.2  Heard about it too when it happened.

Overtime – Regular-season – Extra Attacker - A team shall be allowed to pull its goalkeeper in favor of an additional skater in the overtime period. However, should that team lose the game during the time in which the goalkeeper has been removed, it would forfeit the automatic point gained in the tie at the end of regulation play, except if the goalkeeper has been removed at the call of a delayed penalty against the other team. Should the goalkeeper proceed to his bench for an extra attacker due to a delayed penalty call against the opposing team, and should the non-offending team shoot the puck directly into their own goal, the game shall be over and the team that was to be penalized declared the winner. 

Once the goalkeeper has been removed for an extra attacker in overtime during the regular-season, he must wait for the next stoppage of play before returning to his position. He cannot change “on the fly.” If he does, a bench minor penalty shall be assessed for having an ineligible player. 

---

 Holy crap.

I saw the headlines and just assumed the story was "why on earth would a coach take that risk".