Cathy wrote:

---

SensKat wrote:

---

ok, so.... someone explain to me EXACTLY why we have Star Wars night at NHL games?

---

 It's Star Wars…we don't *need* a reason.

---

 But.... it's random days in the year.  And a bunch of teams seem to do it.  I just don't get it.

SensKat wrote:

---

ok, so.... someone explain to me EXACTLY why we have Star Wars night at NHL games?

---

 It's Star Wars…we don't *need* a reason.

SensKat wrote:

---

ok, so.... someone explain to me EXACTLY why we have Star Wars night at NHL games?

---

 There was one in Florida last week too.  Is Disney an NHL sponsor?

Well, I need correct score to bingo, and all the predictions have been mathematically eliminated.

Goal is good, so it's a deviation goal.

6-3 game.

I…don't think that's going to go our way.

Homer wrote:

---

Cathy wrote:

---

tjlincoln wrote:

---

That tie lasted what? 5 seconds 🤷🏼‍♂️🤦‍♂️

---

 NONSENSE…it lasted 8.

---

 twss

---

 lol 😂 

Chicago scores again.

Play under review for a high stick.

Homer wrote:

---

Sigh... One-timer goal by Chicago.

5-3 bad guys.

---

 This aged like milk.

Homer wrote:

---

Sigh... One-timer goal by Chicago.

5-3 bad guys.

---

 6-3 and Forsberg is making it easier not to resign him, thankfully 

Cathy wrote:

---

I think we should add a caveat to the 3-point square for players with the same last name.

---

lol.  I did a double-take earlier.

Also.... wtf

Sigh... One-timer goal by Chicago.

5-3 bad guys.

I think we should add a caveat to the 3-point square for players with the same last name.

SensKat wrote:

---

also, after a long day of move prep at home, including disassembly of some furniture, plus minor home reno stuff all afternoon and early evening..... Kat may officially be back on the IR

---

Somebody spray the naughty Kat with a water bottle!