Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: Game 45 - Sens @ Wild - Mon Jan 22, 8:00pm

Post Info
Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18070
Date:
RE: Game 45 - Sens @ Wild - Mon Jan 22, 8:00pm
Permalink  
 

Russell wrote:
tjlincoln wrote:
Russell wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

We really need to flush the D... get rid of Oduya, Claesson.. put Phaneuf and Ceci on 3rd pairing- I think Chabot would be ok with Karlsson but D typically take longer to develop. Get a decent 2nd pairing... would make a huuge difference.


 Hopefully, they can move Phaneuf at the deadline to some team looking for veteran depth. Sens will have to eat salary though.


 Will he have to waive a no move clause?


 Probably, but he likely would want out, which would make the loss  of methot even worse. 


 It’s all depressing unless we all think they can turn this around next year 



Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18070
Date:
Permalink  
 
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:
tjlincoln wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:
tjlincoln wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

Have I also mentioned how much I hate Claesson? Last year too. The guy seems just awful.


 So, I’m guessing you would have left him unprotected and protected Methot?  


 100% - I'm going to assume that was a monetary decision because why would you give up a top pairing D for a 3rd? I play defense so I'm always hyper critical of them.


Along w EK’s injuries I really now think this killed the season.  Both equally responsible for this clusterblank 


 Yeah ask Pan and Canuck how the Sens looked vs. The Jets without EK last year.. it was god awful. Like.. worse than awful. Oh yeah and Methot had his finger hacked off at that time too.





Thanks Mr. Crosby for that surgical move 



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21775
Date:
Permalink  
 
tjlincoln wrote:
Russell wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

We really need to flush the D... get rid of Oduya, Claesson.. put Phaneuf and Ceci on 3rd pairing- I think Chabot would be ok with Karlsson but D typically take longer to develop. Get a decent 2nd pairing... would make a huuge difference.


 Hopefully, they can move Phaneuf at the deadline to some team looking for veteran depth. Sens will have to eat salary though.


 Will he have to waive a no move clause?


 Probably, but he likely would want out, which would make the loss  of methot even worse. 



Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18070
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

We really need to flush the D... get rid of Oduya, Claesson.. put Phaneuf and Ceci on 3rd pairing- I think Chabot would be ok with Karlsson but D typically take longer to develop. Get a decent 2nd pairing... would make a huuge difference.


 Hopefully, they can move Phaneuf at the deadline to some team looking for veteran depth. Sens will have to eat salary though.


 Will he have to waive a no move clause?



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 4019
Date:
Permalink  
 
Russell wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

We really need to flush the D... get rid of Oduya, Claesson.. put Phaneuf and Ceci on 3rd pairing- I think Chabot would be ok with Karlsson but D typically take longer to develop. Get a decent 2nd pairing... would make a huuge difference.


 Hopefully, they can move Phaneuf at the deadline to some team looking for veteran depth. Sens will have to eat salary though.


 Yeah I think he's probably pretty valuable in the room. I consider him the new Big Rig



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21775
Date:
Permalink  
 
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

We really need to flush the D... get rid of Oduya, Claesson.. put Phaneuf and Ceci on 3rd pairing- I think Chabot would be ok with Karlsson but D typically take longer to develop. Get a decent 2nd pairing... would make a huuge difference.


 Hopefully, they can move Phaneuf at the deadline to some team looking for veteran depth. Sens will have to eat salary though.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 4019
Date:
Permalink  
 
tjlincoln wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:
tjlincoln wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

Have I also mentioned how much I hate Claesson? Last year too. The guy seems just awful.


 So, I’m guessing you would have left him unprotected and protected Methot?  


 100% - I'm going to assume that was a monetary decision because why would you give up a top pairing D for a 3rd? I play defense so I'm always hyper critical of them.


Along w EK’s injuries I really now think this killed the season.  Both equally responsible for this clusterblank 


 Yeah ask Pan and Canuck how the Sens looked vs. The Jets without EK last year.. it was god awful. Like.. worse than awful. Oh yeah and Methot had his finger hacked off at that time too.



-- Edited by Spezzial-Delivery on Monday 22nd of January 2018 10:30:45 PM

Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18070
Date:
Permalink  
 
senior wrote:
tjlincoln wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

Have I also mentioned how much I hate Claesson? Last year too. The guy seems just awful.


 So, I’m guessing you would have left him unprotected and protected Methot?  


 Don't think they protected him. They could only protect 3 D-men.


 I thought they did, but could be wrong of course.  They left Wideman unprotected for sure



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 4019
Date:
Permalink  
 

We really need to flush the D... get rid of Oduya, Claesson.. put Phaneuf and Ceci on 3rd pairing- I think Chabot would be ok with Karlsson but D typically take longer to develop. Get a decent 2nd pairing... would make a huuge difference.



Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18070
Date:
Permalink  
 
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:
tjlincoln wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

Have I also mentioned how much I hate Claesson? Last year too. The guy seems just awful.


 So, I’m guessing you would have left him unprotected and protected Methot?  


 100% - I'm going to assume that was a monetary decision because why would you give up a top pairing D for a 3rd? I play defense so I'm always hyper critical of them.


Along w EK’s injuries I really now think this killed the season.  Both equally responsible for this clusterblank 



Pie Connoisseur
Status: Offline
Posts: 9016
Date:
Permalink  
 
tjlincoln wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

Have I also mentioned how much I hate Claesson? Last year too. The guy seems just awful.


 So, I’m guessing you would have left him unprotected and protected Methot?  


 Don't think they protected him. They could only protect 3 D-men.



Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18070
Date:
Permalink  
 
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:
tjlincoln wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:
Russell wrote:

Brassard has been awful tonight. 


 Yeah. Usually he's just invisible..  tonight he is really getting in the way.


 lol, that’s cold. 😎


 Lol Brassard is to me what Duchene is to you


 I should start the Mika ZBad comparison charts on these 2



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 4019
Date:
Permalink  
 
tjlincoln wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

Have I also mentioned how much I hate Claesson? Last year too. The guy seems just awful.


 By the way I like your way of thinking 🤔 tonight 


 Lol why do I still get so worked up about it.. I thought I had rage-plateau'd last game.



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 4019
Date:
Permalink  
 
tjlincoln wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

Have I also mentioned how much I hate Claesson? Last year too. The guy seems just awful.


 So, I’m guessing you would have left him unprotected and protected Methot?  


 100% - I'm going to assume that was a monetary decision because why would you give up a top pairing D for a 3rd? I play defense so I'm always hyper critical of them.



Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18070
Date:
Permalink  
 
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

Have I also mentioned how much I hate Claesson? Last year too. The guy seems just awful.


 By the way I like your way of thinking 🤔 tonight 



Jedi Master
Status: Offline
Posts: 23905
Date:
Permalink  
 
sigh....

Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 4019
Date:
Permalink  
 
tjlincoln wrote:
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:
Russell wrote:

Brassard has been awful tonight. 


 Yeah. Usually he's just invisible..  tonight he is really getting in the way.


 lol, that’s cold. 😎


 Lol Brassard is to me what Duchene is to you



Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18070
Date:
Permalink  
 
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:

Have I also mentioned how much I hate Claesson? Last year too. The guy seems just awful.


 So, I’m guessing you would have left him unprotected and protected Methot?  



Alumni
Status: Offline
Posts: 21775
Date:
Permalink  
 

I dunno. Is there much wrong with that hit? Staal  was playing the puck. Was shoulder on shoulder. 



Confident Fan
Status: Offline
Posts: 18070
Date:
Permalink  
 
Spezzial-Delivery wrote:
Russell wrote:

Brassard has been awful tonight. 


 Yeah. Usually he's just invisible..  tonight he is really getting in the way.


 lol, that’s cold. 😎



 
«First  <  1 2 3 410  >  Last»  | Page of 10  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.